The Time Before the Moon; The Moon Is Not What You Think It Is.

In ancient writings and traditions one can find proof of a time when the moon did not exist. Democretus and Anaxagoras mention that there was a time when 'no moon could be seen in the night skies.' In describing the history of the Greek region of Arcadia, Aristotle writes that the 'Pelasgians lived in the area since very old times; at a time when the moon did not exist.' Apollonios from Rhodes mentions something similar; he talks about a time when not all of the celestial objects existed in the sky; before the time of Deucalion’s and Pyrra’s generation (before the cataclysm); when the moon did not exist and the only humans that existed were the Pelasgians living on the mountains of Arcadia (region in Greece). These inhabitants of Arcadia where also known as Proselenes (meaning “those that were before moon” in Greek).

In Plutarch’s work “Morals” we find the following: “There were Arcadians of Evander’s following, the so-called pre-Lunar people. Similarly, Ovid wrote: “The Arcadians are said to have possessed their land before the birth of Zeus, and the folk is older than the Moon.” Stephanus of Byzantium wrote: “Arcadians and females, both exist before the moon”. Hippolytus refers to a legend that “Arcadia brought forth Pelasgus, of greater antiquity than the moon.” Lukianos in his Astrology says that “the Arcadians affirm in their folly that they are older than the moon”. A brief scholion allusion to a “Selenite” community in Arcadia raises a question concerning this epithet and its meaning on the background of similar expressions denoting extreme antiquity.

The better known term associated with the Arcadians is Proselēnoi, namely, pre-lunar, people who preceded the moon. This term is examined through several options of understanding. At the core of this analysis stands the Classical tendency to highly appreciate early periods of time and early peoples. This opens up a discussion of autochthony and the concept of extreme antiquity, particularly associated with Arcadia. The result is an etymologically based mythographic study centred on the Arcadians’ existence in relation to the first appearance of the moon. The conclusion offers a new interpretation of a neglected term.

Evidence has also been found in other parts of the world. In Bolivia, symbols on the wall of the courtyard of Kalasasaya (built in 13,000 BC) provide evidence that the moon came into orbit around the Earth at a specific moment in time thousands of years ago, long before what mainstream historians refer to as recorded history. Moreover the calendar gate in the same site provides evidence that a smaller satellite once rotated around the Earth. 

The oral traditions of Colombian Indians of the Bogota highlands in the eastern Corldilleras of Colombia refer to a time before the moon. “In the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the heavens,” say the tribesmen of Chibchas. Africa also provides its own evidence. According to Zulu legend, the moon was brought hundreds of generations ago by two brothers of alien form, Wowane and Mpanku.

What does all this mean? The ancient memory of an Earth inhabited by humans without a moon has passed from generations to generations forming the traditions of numerous civilizations. How did the moon get there? Is it a part of the Earth? A planet that entered the magnetic Earth’s magnetic field? Was it naturally formed or made by some lost civilization?

DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

House of Tantra · 28 January 2018

Nothing is really what it seems. Also the moon.
Have you ever imagined how it would be to live on the Earth without moon? There are records of legendary “Golden Age” of human civilization, before the moon was in the sky. The age where Saturn was the dominant object in our skies. The moon has a great effect on the Earth and all beings on the surface and under the water. The whole of nature has adapted to the 29-day cycle of the moon, for example the ovulation cycle of humans. Interestingly, this reproductive cycle does not occur in any other animal.

The moon is also connected with the subconscious, it strongly influences the unconscious parts of us, activating them especially during the new and full moon. Already few days before the full moon or the new one, we can feel more annoyed, excited. We can experience emotional processes and quarrels with loved ones. This is the time of activation of the emotional body with narrow awareness of what is happening.

Some studies found evidence that people with mental disorders generally experience violent or aggressive episodes during the full Moon. The full moon has been associated with strange or insane behavior, including suicide, sleepwalking and violence. Lunar astronomy accurately indicated that the repression of the moon’s gravitational influence brings about social tension, disharmony and bizarre results.

Zulu Mythology about the Moon

Zulu Shaman, Credo Mutwa said that Zulu legends believe The Moon to be hollow and the home of the Python or hitauri or as David Icke calls them the Archons”, a race of intelligent extraterrestrials. The legend states The Moon was brought here hundreds of generations ago by two brothers, Wowane and Mpanku, who were the leaders of these Reptilian extraterrestrials.

These two were known as the water brothers and they both had scaly skin like a fish. This tale is very similar to the Mesopotamia and Sumerian accounts about the two chief leader brothers Enlil (Yahweh) and Enki, (The Serpent). Credo continues telling the Zulu legends of how Wowane and Mpanku stole The Moon in the form of an egg from the “Great Fire Dragon,” and emptied out the yolk until it was hollow. Then they “rolled” The Moon across the sky to the Earth which brought about cataclysmic events on this planet that ended the “Golden Age” of the past.

Credo Mutwa claims that the Earth was very different then it is now before The Moon had arrived. There weren’t any seasons and the planet was perpetually engulfed by a canopy of water vapor. People did not feel the strong glare of the Sun that we do now, and they could only see it through a watery mist. The Earth was once a beautiful place, a lovely place, lush and green with giant Redwoods, Violets and Ferns with a gentle drizzle and mist. The water canopy fell to the Earth as a cataclysm of rain when The Moon was put into place in the Earth’s orbit. This is symbolized in the Bible when it rains for 40 days and 40 nights. 

The arrival of The Moon and the Reptilians changed everything on Earth. It modified the Earth’s rotation and angle. The earth turned over on its axis as we are upside down, as the legend says, and brought more powerful tidal systems that once had been much calmer. Women did not menstruate before The Moon arrived. 

Zulus and other native African accounts say The Moon was built far, far, away to keep an eye on people, and as a vehicle to travel the Universe. Credo says that the Reptilians “Giant Mother-ship” is The Moon and that’s where they escaped to during the cataclysms of the “Great Flood,” which they had caused by manipulating The Moon and creating other cosmic events.

Interesting are views of G.I.Gurdjieff and Madame Blavatsky: ”Everything living on the Earth, people, animals, plants, is food for the Moon. The Moon is a huge living being feeding upon all that lives and grows on the Earth.” They both agree the moon is vampirising the life forms of Earth.

It seems, that although the moon can negatively affect most of people, some of the spiritually developed and creative cultures have been able to use these influences in a positive way. As Moon enhances everything that is in subconsciousness, if we gather lots of positive experiences and integrate all rejected parts, we can channel this energy for personal and collective benefit. The proper adaptation to the cycles of the moon in work, plant cultivation, sexual life and spiritual practices had ensured prosperity of ancient societies. 

It was possible for one reason. As human beings, we grow and develop through the transformation of an individual and collective shadow. In our time, the collective subconsciousness bombs the planet daily with loads of fear, suppressed desire and anger. As we find ourselves here on earth, work on the transformation of shadow becomes our responsibility.

The moon can perfectly gather and condense dark energies, giving the opportunity to transform them.
Many development methods have been created using the cycles of the moon and its influences. All magical rituals and spiritual practices in full and new moon become more powerful. Unfortunately, many have used the moon’s power for negative and selfish purposes. They were to much attracted by his invisible dark side."

The Time Before the Moon Part 1

The Time Before the Moon Part 2

The moon holds a significant relationship with the Earth: if there were no moon, our daily lives as humans would significantly change.The first and most obvious change would be during the nighttime. Nights would be unbelievably darker, as the moon provides light to the Earth during the night hours by reflecting light from the sun. Scientists suggest that without human-made lighting, we would not be able to see the hands in front of our face without the moon during the nighttime. However, not only would nights be darker, but our days would change as well.

Just as the Earth exerts a gravitational pull, the moon also exerts a gravitational pull on the Earth. The moon pulls on the Earth and slows down the Earth’s rotation. The moon’s pull creates a bulge near the Earth’s equator, which means there is a lower level of water at the poles. The Moon’s gravity causes the oceans on our planet to rise and fall. As the water moves, there is slight friction between the moving water and the spinning Earth. This friction causes the Earth’s rotation to slow slightly. If there was no moon, then the water might spread across the planet equally and reduce the amount of friction.

This means that the earth would not slow, which then means that the hours of our days would change. Suddenly, without the moon, our days would last between 6 and 12 hours, rather than the 24 hours we experience now. If our days became this short, then we would have significantly more days in our calendar year. Instead of 365 days in a year, we would have over a thousand.

Since the moon affects the altitude and movement of Earth’s water, our ocean tides would shrink. High tide occurs where the ocean bulges toward the moon, or where the moon pulls the ocean towards it. On the opposite side of our planet, the ocean bulges away from the moon, creating another high tide. The low tides occur on either side of the bulges. Remember that the Earth is rotating, so high tide becomes low tide as the Earth turns.

Scientists suggest that without the moon, tides would be 1/3 of the size they are now. High tides would be much smaller than they are now, and low tides would be even lower. This is because the sun would be influencing the tides, not the moon; however, the sun has a weaker pull, which would decrease the tides.

The change in the Earth’s rotational speed and a change in the Earth’s tilt would also affect the Earth’s weather patterns. If the moon slows down the Earth’s rotation, then the moon also affects the wind and wind speeds on our planet. Without the moon, we would see an increase in wind speeds. Winds could become much faster and much stronger without the moon.

Additionally, we might see a change entirely in seasons. The moon affects the angle of the Earth’s tilt. Currently, the Earth sits at a 23.5-degree tilt. This means our planet leans slightly to one side as it sits in space. The tilt creates what we know as seasons and changing weather. Without the pull of the moon, this tilt would change. Either the tilt would become extreme, leading to extreme and severe seasons, or the tilt would decrease, and we would see almost no seasons at all.

The moon influences life as we know it on Earth. It influences our oceans, weather, and the hours in our days. Without the moon, tides would fall, nights would be darker, seasons would change, and the length of our days would alter.

“Is The Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?”

 

In July 1970, two Russian scientists, Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, published an article in the Soviet journal Sputnik entitled “Is The Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?” They advanced the theory that The Moon is not a completely natural world, but a planetoid that was hollowed out in the far reaches of space by intelligent beings possessing a technology far superior to ours, using a comet to tow it to the Earth. Or maybe under its own power. Huge machines were used to melt rock and form large cavities within The Moon, spewing the molten refuse on the surface. 

Protected by a hull-like inner shell plus a reconstructed outer shell of metallic rocky junk, this gigantic craft was steered through the cosmos and finally parked in orbit around the Earth.In their article Vasin and Shcherbakov wrote, “Abandoning the traditional paths of common sense, we have plunged into what may at first sight seem to be unbridled fantasy. The more minutely we go into all the information gathered about The Moon, the more we are convinced that there is not a single fact to rule out our supposition. Not only that, many things so far considered to be lunar enigmas are explainable in the light of this new hypothesis.”More Pyramids on the Moon because that sure doesn’t look like Egypt.

Outrageous as the spacecraft Moon theory might first appear, consider how this model reconciles all the mysteries of The Moon. It explains why The Moon gives evidence of being older than the Earth and perhaps even our solar system and why there are three distinct layers within The Moon, with the densest materials on the outside layer, as one would expect of the “hull” of a spacecraft would be. It could also explain why no sign of water has been found on the Moon’s surface, yet there is evidence it exists deep inside. This theory also would explain the strange maria and mascons, perhaps the remnants of the machinery used to hollow out The Moon. The idea of an artificial satellite could explain the odd, rhythmic “moon quakes” as artificial constructs reacting the same way during periods of stress from the Earth’s pull. And artificial equipment beneath the Moon’s surface might be the source of the gas clouds that have been observed.

A scientist called Irwin I. Shapiro who works at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for astrophysics said, “Looking at all the anomaly’s and unanswered questions about The Moon, the best explanation for The Moon is observational error, it doesn’t exist” Irwin I. Shapiro is a respected figure in astrophysics, his research includes using gravitational lenses to assess the age of the universe.

\A planet of our size with such a low gravitational field shouldn’t have such a big Moon. When we look at other planets with satellites, they are much larger than Earth, with a much stronger gravitational pull and their Moons are much smaller to them in comparison. From what I can see, our Moon is an anomaly, it shouldn’t be there. If Earth was to have a Moon it should be MUCH smaller, possibly 30 miles or so in diameter at the very most and not this giant in the sky that we see in the night.

If the precise and stationary orbit of The Moon is seen as sheer coincidence, is it also coincidence that The Moon is at just the right distance from the Earth to completely cover the Sun during an eclipse. While the diameter of The Moon is a mere 2,160 miles against the Sun’s gigantic 864,000 miles, it is nevertheless in just the right position to block out all but the Sun’s flaming corona when it moves between the Sun and the Earth. Asimov explained: “There is no astronomical reason why The Moon and the Sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion”.

Let’s consider the Moon’s orbit , it is nearly a perfect circle, but stationary, one side always facing the Earth with only the slightest variation. As far as we know, it’s the only natural satellite with such an orbit.

This circular orbit is especially odd considering that the Moon’s center of mass lies more than a mile closer to the Earth than its geometric center. This fact alone should produce an unstable, wobbly orbit, much like a ball with its mass off-center it will not roll in a straight line. Almost all the other satellites in our solar system orbit in the plane of their planet’s equator. Not so with The Moon, whose orbit lies strangely nearer the Earth’s orbit around the Sun or inclined to the Earth’s ecliptic by more than five degrees. Add to this that the Moon’s bulge, is located on the side facing away from Earth, thus negating the idea that it was caused by the Earth’s gravitational pull, makes for an off-balanced world.

Is it merely coincidence? How does one explain this and many other Moon mysteries?

” It is a shame that one small thing remains unaccounted for. One trifling thing I have ignored so far, WHAT IN BLAZES IS OUR MOON DOING WAY OUT THERE? It’s too far out to be a true satellite of Earth. It’s too BIG to have been CAPTURED by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and The Moon then having taken up a nearly circular orbit about the Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible”.

” But, then, if The Moon is neither a true satellite of the Earth nor a captured one, what is it? ” (Asimov on Astronomy Mercury Press, 1963.)

Over the years, it has been scientifically observed that the Earth’s Moon holds some strange characteristics. It is believed to have been created by a giant impact between the young Earth and a Mars-sized body. After examination, it has been noted that The Moon is apparently in the wrong orbit for its size, according to its current assumed density. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of The Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable speculation that it could be hollow. Some of these claims come from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, it rings like a bell. When the Apollo crew, on November 20, 1969, released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with The Moon causing the seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation for more than an hour.

The Moon is far older than previously expected, maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old, while Moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years. The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sit is remarkably different from the rocks themselves. This indicates that the lunar surface may have been moved from somewhere else and placed on The Moon. Some of the Moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that The Moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions. Hundreds of moon quakes are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. Some of the quakes seem to follow a specific schedule.

The moon’s crust is much harder than originally presumed. When NASA was recorded drilling down a few inches into the Moon’s surface, it appeared that metal shavings were visible. Earth’s Moon is the only natural satellite in the Solar System that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. How does one explain the coincidence that The Moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Professional astronomers have been gradually discouraged from investigating a phenomenon that has been reported on The Moon for 1,000 years. It is short-lived light, color, or other changes in the appearance of the lunar surface, referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena.

Mathematical Impossibilities of the Moon

Another impossibility that has always been an embarrassment to the scientific establishment is the obvious fact that an object as heavy as The Moon, caught in the earth’s gravity, would inevitably come crashing down upon us at immense speeds. Responses to this argument from the Lunarists have always been weak, and always couched in that scientific news speak designed to confuse the sincere questioner without actually saying anything.

The establishment most often cites the work of Isaac Newton in support of its story. Newton is well-known for coming up with entirely theoretical notions such as the Law of Universal Gravitation, and his more famous Laws of Motion which serve to gloss over the more obvious inconsistencies in The Moon story. Less known for is his “extra-curricular” pursuits, which he kept secret during his lifetime which have since been uncovered. Newton was a dominating figure in the Royal Society, a fellowship riddled with members of the various secret societies whose goal to dominate the world has already been outlined. Newton himself possessed copies of Rosicrucian manifestos, and, is clear in his notes, had studied them thoroughly. Many of his biographers suspect that he shared the religious beliefs of many of his colleagues. It does not take a genius to conclude that these beliefs may have influenced his scientific reasoning.Humm, are those just thought bubbles above his head? Look Closely in his visor. Is there two people there?

The majority of scientists and professors of most universities are members of organizations such as these, as are most of the scientists who work for NASA. Those that are not realize that their livelihood depends on towing the establishment line, and only a few have had the courage to speak out.

However, eminent scientists, working in defiance of the establishment, have proven conclusively, using the most scrupulous methods, that if an object such as The Moon really existed, it could not remain fixed in the sky for very long. Proactive arguments in support of this finding return to a closer examination of the original mathematical formula generally referenced when rallying to solidify the moon’s improbable existence:

F = GMm/r2

Where F = gravitational attraction

G = the gravitational constant

M= mass of one body

m = mass of the second body

r= distance between the two bodies

Established by Newton himself, this numerical gem is based completely on the assumption that The Moon travels in concentric circles around our planet. F (the gravitational attraction holding The Moon to its “true” path) requires that r (the distance between the two celestial bodies) remains constant. Should the distance, r, decrease at any given moment, the gravitational force will increase in strength.

When this event occurs The Moon will be pulled towards this planet. According to Newton’s theory that a body set in motion remains in motion, such an incident would initiate a logical series of events with a singular chaotic result. Propagated drawing of satellite to planet until the two massive bodies collide.Garbage dump on the Moon

However, even the most fanatical Lunarists no longer cling to the absurd notion that objects in the solar system travel in concentric circles. These so-called “scientists” have changed their story so many times, who knows what to believe anymore? The now fashionable dogma is that the route followed by celestial bodies is not circular but a concave oval with the origin point at the center (in the case of the earth, the sun; in the case of The Moon, the earth) followed by a spiraling series of pathways. Thus, The Moon is not maintaining a constant distance from our planet. Our orbiting satellite is forever oscillating towards us, drawing near then distant, in a continuous cycle. Each successive approach brings this massive wonder closer to our midst.

In other words, The Moon does indeed alter its distance from the earth. So why is it not widespread knowledge that the end, mathematically predicated BY NEWTON’S OWN FORMULA, has been anticipated and is drawing near? Due to some irrational explanation The Moon has managed to defy those very laws of physics that were originally developed to prove its existence.

After hundreds of years of detailed observation and study, our closest companion in the vast universe, Earth’s Moon, remains an enigma. Six moon landings and hundreds of experiments have resulted in more questions being asked than answered.

Moon Mysteries

•  Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; Moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.
•  Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.
•  Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with The Moon. The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned. So let’s not say anything.
• Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of The Moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles
•  Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on The Moon itself. This could not have originated from a “close call” with Earth, as such an encounter would have ripped The Moon apart.
• No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that The Moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.
• Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria, are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly an artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident.
• Seismic Activity: Hundreds of Moon quakes are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of The Moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as The Moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.
• Hollow Moon: The Moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) where the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, “If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of The Moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.” Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the Moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside The Moon where is “simply a cavity.” MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, “the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the Moon’s gravitational field. Indicating the possibility that The Moon might be hollow.” In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, “A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object.”
• Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash to the Moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial Moon quake with startling characteristics. The Moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact The Moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that The Moon has an unusually light, or has no core.
• Unusual Metals: The Moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 “Blackbird”.
• Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, so was rust-proof iron particles.
• Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ Moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the Moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago. Another theory was the Moon was created from leftover “space dust” remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of Moon rocks disproved this theory also. Another popular theory is The Moon was somehow “captured” by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated, “It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and The Moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible.
• “Weird Orbit: Our Moon is the only Moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the Moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the Moon’s bulge is on the far side of The Moon, away from the Earth. “Something” had to put The Moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.
• Moon Diameter: How does one explain the “coincidence” that The Moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds, “There is no astronomical reason why The Moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion.”
• Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as The Moon Spacecraft Theory is, all the above items are resolved if one assumes that The Moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.

Well the craters can’t be only from impacts because many craters seem so shallow despite their size. Many scientists still wonder about this and based on the impact and size across the craters, the depth should be 4 to 6 times that deep. They defy known science. Take Bailly for example. This crater is about 303 miles across but only 4 to 5 miles deep.

The Moon is extremely dry and does not appear to have ever had water in any substantial amounts. None of The Moon rocks, regardless of where they were found, contained free water or even water molecules bound into the minerals. Yet Apollo 16 astronauts found Moon rocks that contained bits of rusted iron. Since oxidation requires oxygen and free hydrogen, this rust indicates there must be water somewhere on The Moon.

Experts were surprised to find lunar rocks bearing brass, mica and amphibole in addition to the near-pure titanium. Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237, elements not previously found in nature, were discovered in Moon rocks, according to the Argone National Laboratory. While still trying to explain the presence of these materials, scientists were further startled to learn of rust-proof iron particles in a soil sample from the Sea of Crisis. In 1976, the Associated Press reported that the Soviets had announced the discovery of iron particles that “do not rust” in samples brought back by an unmanned Moon mission in 1970. Iron that does not rust is unknown in nature and well beyond present Earth technology.

A HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE? THE WAVE FUNCTION IS REAL: THE HOLOGRAPHIC QUANTUM MODEL, August, 2003 By Noel Huntley, Ph.D.

This question is being given increasing attention within mainstream scientific investigations. Here we shall focus on one particular aspect that the author has researched for most of a lifetime, but the reader is advised that many investigators have presented a wide variety of evidence for the tenability of a holographic universe.

Following the author's approach we have a double task. Firstly, let us show by taking a small part of our universe that it (the small part) in itself is holographic. Then we must show that this small part reflects the same characteristics as other parts of the universe, ranging up to the whole. For the layman, this is what holographic means: the whole is reflected in any part or subpart.

We shall firstly show that the learning pattern structure, the basis of skills and physical coordination, is holographic. A physical skill is a series of movements that are coordinated (connected) in space (two or more movements which are simultaneous) and also in time (in sequence but there must be connections in time).

When a sequence of movements is learned, the sub-elements---the muscles/muscle fibres, the tiny parts of the movements, the 'bits' as in a computer, that is, the information---are all cross-referenced. All these trillions of tiny parts must be linked under a single heading, precisely as a president of a company integrates everyone in the company: the executives, the managers, the ground-floor workers. The learning pattern builds up in the same manner from 'ground-floor' to 'managers' to 'executives' to 'president' except that in the learning pattern there are millions of levels (ranks) in the form of this described company hierarchy.

Figure 1 illustrates the similarity to the company organisation. This figure emphasises the spatial connections in the now, whereas Figure 2 shows the temporal relationships. Let us take an example of a golfer. He or she addresses the ball with the club face; then proceeds to swing back and forwards fairly quickly, subsequently striking the ball. All these body positions and movements must be cross-referenced, that is, coordinated under a single 'president' or input control point within the mind. Note that the amateur will not form a single pattern of the swing, and these patterns will have weak links, sometimes causing a jump from one established pattern to another parallel one ('losing the swing'). But for the expert, a single learning pattern will be formed for the complete sequence: from addressing the ball, swinging, to hitting the ball.

The mind senses only one creative thought---the intention of hitting the ball well. The learning-pattern structure's computer-features have taken the input energy of the intention at the 'president' level and distributed it automatically by means of the executives, managers, and ground-floor workers. Whereas the novice has to keep 'filling' in the gaps (managers, executives missing) using conscious creative thought, that is, the application of the intention. This is also why the swing is quite fast in the backswing and not generally pausing before the forward swing---otherwise the limit to how much time activity can be spanned will be reached resulting in the learning pattern, in effect, 'breaking' into two or more learning patterns in series. When the full integration has been developed the learning pattern's configuration is holistic. It must be---the parts of the movements must be linked automatically to execute a pattern of movements performed accurately and at speed. In fact a well-developed learning pattern must set like concrete.

It is necessary here to limit our information of the learning pattern to what is relevant to providing evidence of a holographic universe. The reader may see that the pyramid configuration, the learning pattern or the company organisation, gives a framework which has the potential for holographic application.

Let us now look at the experiential side of the argument. Anyone knows that when we execute skilled movements there is control, yet there is automaticity---the movements must become automatic. But this is a contradiction. It can in fact only be resolved by means of the holographic mechanism. How does a person control every detail of a complex (learned) sequence of movements, such as at a keyboard, but at the same time they can relax the focus of attention, shift it about, think of other things or be highly conscious of all movements. This is extremely significant and demands an explanation. Unfortunately one is so unaware of what's happening here, the mind, including the scientific mind, skips it as not important.

The mind ideates movements and the learning pattern provides the mechanism for the execution of physical movements. The ideation is the input to the learning patterns. By trained observation one will notice that the ideation is synonymous with input and is expressed as the attention. This attention can have countless distributions during a learning sequence. In two whole arm motions as in keyboard performance the attention distribution may shift from one finger, to the wrists, one whole arm, two whole arms (as a unit), both hands, or part of one's finger motion. Any of these states can be focussed on at will, and countless more, without interfering with the flow of the sequence. In fact any of these states, the ideations just stated, act as an input for the learning patterns. How can this be?

In holistic systems (see article on holistic systems), all parts are in resonance or coherence, which quantum regenerates the whole. This means a holistic system can be activated or maintained in operation by resonating with any part of its energies; from the smallest part (bit) to the whole. This is inherently holographic since any 'size' ideation (span/state of attention) can activate or continue the activation of the learning patterns. That is, when executing a learned sequence, attention, say, on one finger will keep the whole going. Realise that current science is completely unfamiliar with an understanding of a harmonic science of which holistic systems play a major role.

To break this down, consider a screen with dots on it. Let these dots be the 'bits' (as in computers) of the learning patterns. The bits are in effect basic storage elements and will store one pulse of energy/information---which can be replenished continually. Now imagine these dots distributed into various patterns or groupings spatially (we are not considering time yet), and let these patterns send a corresponding distribution of pulses to provide physical movements of the body. One pattern for instance might activate several fingers and a wrist, etc. Note that for a learned sequence though there is no isolated pattern. All the dots are basically cross-referenced; let's say for the sake of simplicity all are linked behind the screen for a learned condition.

Now if every dot is interconnected. When we activate dots they activate the whole (behind the screen). This is a slightly weak model for showing the holographic effect but it has the advantage of potentially illustrating the connections in time as we shall see. This whole screen pattern is a spatially frozen one in time---one frame of many frames in a 'footage' for the sequence of movements. It is a quantum state. All tensions in the body whether hands and arms or neck or eyebrow become totally cross-referenced; each tends to activate the others. This is why it is vital to relax the body in general when learning skills and only allow the programme to high-light the relevant tensions (see article on instrumental technique). This means at the 'president' level (behind the screen) the formatting of the programme is one undivided whole---one wave carrying the sublevels within it---and the programme is, as far as possible, relevant to the desired activity.

Now imagine this distribution of bits on the screen switching on and off. It is thus replaced by other frames of dots which may or may not have the same distribution, depending on whether any change has been made in the movements. Thus we have different whole frames of these 'dot' patterns switching on and off. However, there would be no learning unless these frames were connected in time. These frames have information density in space (number of bits/dots per unit space) and information density in time (number of frames per unit time). But these information (space and time) densities are the same since the learning patterns act fourth dimensionally---in spacetime.

What we are leading up to is that the learning patterns act holographically in time, as well as space. We now have to imagine the dots of one frame interconnected to the dots of consecutive frames. The amount of time spanned---number of frames as it 'moves' through time---is governed by the degree of learning or the level of skill. This is called holographic amplification. The holographic 4D learning patterns span space and time and 'move' through time maintaining a holographic continuum, which means the interlinking of movements continues through time, much like we scroll information on a computer screen. The information in the holographic learning pattern is continually being reset (from circuits containing all the information for the whole sequence).

In Figure 2 we might for simplicity consider unit A, B, C, D as providing impulses for finger action, say, one after the other, that is, in time. One has to imagine the temporal triangle superimposed on the spatial triangle but at 90 degrees, now extending in time. We see the interconnection throughout the learning pattern structure ('managers', 'executives' 'president'). This means when, say, a finger action A is made, its accuracy and control is governed and aided by all the other units in the learning pattern. Similarly for B, C, D, etc. In effect, future positions of movements can consolidate the present ones. This is an extraordinary concept but merely the property of holistic systems (see article on holographic control for another angle on this). If the investigator can make the observations indicated here he or she will be convinced that the learning pattern is holographic---and that there is no other way skills could be executed so that there is control and automaticity.

There is much more detailed information on this approach, for example, in the author's book Superhuman of over 25 years ago the similarity to evolution of the human species of how the bits/units of the learning pattern expand---actually multiply (reproduce)---was recognised but it seemed so far-fetched for any reader to believe, it was omitted (it is now fairly common knowledge within the New-Age field). Nevertheless just as these units of information---say, one (group) for one finger motion---'evolve up' the learning pattern pyramid to operate more fingers, etc., like a ground-floor worker is promoted up the company ranking scale---manager, executive, etc.---so collective consciousness of a race operates in similar divided units and evolves/ascends this hierarchy from its own low individuated levels to high integrated levels.

What are the justifications for considering that this mere learning pattern indicates that the whole universe is holographic? When we look at the schematics of the learning patterns, see Figures 1 and 2, we see the hierarchical properties. The lower levels operate within the context of the higher levels. The ground-floor workers function in the context of the managers; the managers in the context of the executives, etc. These levels have the characteristics of fractals (see articles on fractals); groups within groups: repeated similar patterns but with change in dimension. For example, the tree has a fractal structure: trunk to branch, to smaller branches, etc. to twigs; or the human arm: shoulder joint, elbow joint, wrist, and fingers. Furthermore, on a larger scale we have planets, stars, galaxies, clusters of galaxies, superclusters of galaxies, universe, these are all self-similar patterns on different dimensional scales.

We must allow for the fact that science has only a 'surface' or 3D interpretation of entities of the universe. A planet's energy is in the form of a vortex and has an oscillation as large as the planet---it has wholeness in its own right, apart from the molecules that make up its physical structure. Similarly a star encompasses its whole solar system, as an undivided whole, a vortex; and so on. Even atomic systems will be found to be compatible with the macro-configurations described above. The atom functions on wave mechanics; similarly it will be discovered that the solar system likewise operates on the same wave principles. These are all correspondences on different dimensional levels.

We are familiar with the philosophical statement, 'As above, so below' which is based on the axiom of Hermeticism, 'What is here is everywhere; What is not here is nowhere'. This again is the holographic property. Let us quote some leading physicists, philosophers and science writers:

Ouspensky, in his book A New Model of the Universe, states that everything is everywhere and always. Physicist John Wheeler of Princeton states that the geometrodynamical quantum foam of superspace represents a superhologram of the universe, and physicist Jack Sarfatti's interpretation of this quantum superspace is that the wormholes connect all parts of the universe directly to every other part. Leading physicist David Bohm stresses quantum interconnectedness and unbroken wholeness. Charles Muses and Arthur Young refer to objects as superhologram images. Science writer Michael Talbot reiterates that thought processes are holographic in that all thoughts are infinitely cross-referenced with all other thoughts. Physicist Keith Floyd states that holographic models of consciousness make such brain processes as memory, perception, and imaging clearly explainable. Science writer Fritjof Capra speaks of the universe as a hologram, in which each part determines the whole.

We will now introduce a completely unfamiliar law of physics which is inherent in every energy process. This has been given in the author's other articles. It is the intrinsic relationship between integration and differentiation. Wholes inherently contain parts. When the relationship between parts and whole is noncoherent---such as a motor car---the whole is equal to the sum of the parts (3D logic). Clearly there is no holographic relationship in this case---it is a linear one-line relation. If, however, the parts are coherent (as in harmonic and benevolent technologies), the whole is greater than the sum of the parts---which is a property of life and all natural entities of the universe. The relationship now becomes nonlinear/hierarchical as demonstrated by the company organisation model given here. The special relation integration/differentiation now applies. The integration thus means the parts are coherent (common frequencies in phase).

With this relationship, the greater the integration, the greater the differentiation. For example, one strives to learn independence of finger action in skills, such as piano technique, but one does not realise that to achieve independence one must develop dependence, meaning integration of greater numbers of movements spanned by the learning patterns as one whole. This also contains the true definition of skill/technique---see other articles.

If a society was operating with a proper relationship of these variables, satisfying the integration/differentiation principle, because of the greater harmony of the whole there would be greater recognition of individual rights (differentiation). In general, our perceptions have greater sensitivity for the parts (any variation, irregularities, errors) when the whole is focussed upon. Psychologists have done experiments which indicate this but haven't known why or what they meant.

The apparent reason why focus on the whole gives more information about any part within the whole, than focus upon that part, is because the whole is a larger quantum state than a part and is an oscillation of higher frequency. The whole represents a higher-order configuration; information rate and information density automatically have to be greater---this is also higher intelligence. As an example, science will eventually establish that a solar system is a whole quantum state oscillation, and is of higher frequency than the quantum oscillations of the planets (the parts).

The fractal nature of the world is well established. We know that fractals are self-similar patterns on different dimensional scales. This is clearly a property of the holograph produced from the hologram photographic plate. The author, in the articleFree Will and Fractals, shows also that consciousness could be analysed in terms of fractals, tying in with our other approach of relating consciousness to the learning pattern and in turn with its holographic character. Thus consciousness and freewill are inherently holographic. But why? See article The Source of Fractals. To express in energy form, in the most efficient manner, the basic unmanifest of no space or time, those energies will distribute so that the infinite potential parts separate out, covering small to large to the whole (every state), forming a hierarchy with smallest parts (lowest frequencies) at the 'bottom', rising to the whole at the 'top', and all parts are interlinked and can thus access the others but through the rules/physics of the dimensional levels.

Thus the whole is reflected in its parts and we have a holographic property. The greater the strength of the whole (meaning unity) the greater the strength of the part or individual---more energy, frequency, understanding, is fed to that part. Each part is as strong as its whole is operating efficiently.

As a very brief piece of evidence for those readers who recognise valuable transmissions of information from extraterrestrials is that we are told Earth has a blueprint, that is, it has codes with correspondences to human DNA. These codes are stored in the planet's grid system. This is of course an area which our orthodox science knows nothing about. Thus if the grid codes are changed (or mutated), this informational change will transfer to all living DNA on the planet (similarly the reverse flow will also work).

The universe is holographic fractally (as opposed to infinitely holographic), for example, the levels, planet, solar system, galaxy, are fractal levels similar to the relationship of wrist, elbow, and shoulder. However, note that these levels are 'selected' discrete manifest structures, whereas in the background would be a virtual fine holographic gradient, as is demonstrated if we cut up a hologram photographic plate into increasing smaller parts---all parts manifest the whole image. What is this holographic background? It would be the true nature of unity. Unity, beyond spacetime, must be intrinsically holographic, covering the complete virtual state gradient (see article on unity in the new educational series).

THE WAVE FUNCTION IS REAL: THE HOLOGRAPHIC
QUANTUM MODEL

In quantum physics the wave function (denoted by the Greek psi symbol) is sometimes referred to as mathematical fiction. When Schrodinger developed his famous wave equation, it was a puzzle as to what psi really represented. It was concluded that the wave function depicted probabilities---and not energy.

Here we shall be using the wave function to mean a packet of vibrations as in current quantum mechanics but that in our case we envision everything imaginable in the universe as made up of waves. Any specific thing whatsoever is not just represented by, but is a group of oscillations given by sine waves. These groups of sine waves representing all phenomena, such as a particle, an atom, planet, galaxy, objects, a thought, word, concepts or ideas, mind, etc. may be immensely complex, comprising waves in fractal groups extending into higher dimensions, in which their phase relationship is of key importance. These wave functions are holographic and have a precise geometry. This geometry is information.

Every single wave function is a packet of information. The vibrations of the wave function are energy but also probabilities given by sub-sine wave groupings. The resonant linkages between them will vary in strength giving different probability weighting---no different from the principle of habit patterns. (Learning occurs by mode locking, that is, entraining separate oscillations---as in associating.)

Quantum energy is actually quantum action, that is, energy multiplied by time (as one whole). Thus it would be expected that the wave function was not the physicist's energy E, which is a 3D expression of work done. Quantum action has a thickness in time. It is 4D.

One of the main reasons why the wave function in current quantum physics has to be considered fictional is because it is expressed by the resultant of many sub-wave functions representing probabilities or attributes of entities of the natural world in the form of respective orthogonals. These orthogonals are dimensions and may be great in number. Let's simplify this and refer to the famous 'Schrodinger's cat'.

The cat is hidden in a box and is subject to the possibility of being poisoned; the probability of which is governed by a random generator. We don't know whether the cat is alive or dead until we open the box. The wave function will be the resultant of both probabilities; that for the cat to be dead and that for it to be alive. The Y-axis could represent 'death' and the X-axis 'alive'. The wave function in Schrodinger's equation gives the superposition of these two separate wave functions for being dead and alive. The graph or resultant wave function gives both probabilities simultaneously and holistically. But we know that when we look into the box that the cat will be either dead or alive, not both.

Now let us say the resultant graph (wave function) is, say, closer to the Y-axis. In this case this resultant (in the quantum reality) will 'collapse' onto the Y-axis, and a single probability is considered to have been selected by the observation (Copenhagen Interpretation). The cat is observed dead. The equation does not, however, give the 'collapse'. In real applications of the wave function the procedures can be very complex but always accurate. For example, several particles interacting would each have to be represented by three dimensions, that is, different ones for each particle; for example, nine dimensional axes or orthogonals for three electrons. Thus we see the unreality of the resultant wave function.

Our general holographic wave function should be pictured as made up of sine waves of different frequencies and, in particular, having phase relationships. The wave function is not linear or of a single level but multidimensional and can be envisaged as groups of sine waves within groups displaced along the gradient 3D to 4D, governed by frequency.

This packet of waves and its resultants at different fractal levels (the groups) follows the rules of Fourier analysis. Any resultants of subgroups or the whole resultant can be broken down by resonant waves giving the true nature of quantum reduction from one higher fractal level to a lower one. This process of quantum reduction---resultant waves reducing to lower-dimensional sine waves, a form of Fourier analysis---occurs continuously along with the reverse: quantum regeneration in which separate lower-dimensional sine waves, when correlated, form higher-dimensional resultants---a form of Fourier synthesis (this is how the laser really works). Figure 2, in the article on physical mobility, part II, showing vortices within vortices, is also a wave function, and these articles should preferably be studied before this one.

We know by now that the Newtonian view of the universe does not give an accurate picture. Quantum physics is much nearer the truth. The universe is not made of empty space with objects in it but is more akin to a complex webwork of interconnecting energies: everything conceivable is made up of vibrations, in other words, is a wave function.

When wave functions have 'entangled, there can be an immediate transmission of information from one resonant component to another---distance is no object. This is a feature of current quantum theory and one can see the applications of this principle to many everyday experiences, even to forming a basis for paranormal phenomena; also the ability of animals to read vibrations of energies and acquire information, an ability which escapes us.

Although everything might be considered as a basic energy of consciousness moulded by wave functions, not all objects are holistic or, in other words, are a single or whole wave function. Only natural entities in which the whole is greater than the sum of the parts, such as a planet or cell, are a single resultant sine wave pattern. A car, for example, is a composite of many wave functions (of molecules, etc.).

As a different kind of example, consider coordination of the human body, say, two arms at a keyboard. For a learned sequence, a wave function will be controlling the relationship between all movements, that is, a single wave function at every instant (this instant is smaller the higher the frequency). The sine wave groups within this wave function change their phase angle as motion of arms, etc., continues. This wave function gives the precise geometry of energy-formatting within which the limbs take position in space and time. Obviously this coordinates with the muscular tensions.

In skills we experience within the mind this wave function as the kinesthetic sense. Consciousness or the input senses the information of the wave function. This information is holographically spread in both space and time, holistically. Within the wave function the smaller waves deal with the 3D sharp focus of activity, such as part of one finger movement, but the larger waves span more time enabling one to feel, in the margin of consciousness, the immediate future movements. If this didn't occur one could not make any controlled movements! This means that at any instant one not only senses the present movement and position of a limb, but also the immediate future ones simultaneously in a multidimensional manner (through the regular fractal levels within the wave function).

Realise that every oscillation is a vortex, and two or more vortices in phase will attract to create motion. In skill behaviour the vortices are centred at the joints. One should imagine these vortices as enveloping the limbs---which are executing a skilled sequence---with infinite complexity of vortices within vortices, involving a shifting around as any smaller vortex is precipitated into 3D (quantum reduced) by a larger one---in continuous nonlinear activity.

The geometrical patterning within the wave function from large to small is precisely the same as that of the universe's fractal nature. It must also be the same principle occurring in the amazing genetic processes which we tend to take for granted. We might see from this that the large wave function for our universe would span all time for this universe (and all space) as a unity. But as we come down the levels within the wave function, increasing separation occurs and therefore the manifestation of time and the phenomena of objects and particles, individuals, etc. (as being separate from one another).

Within this wave function the sine waves, in general, vary in size and dimensions (e.g., 3.2D, 3.8D, 4.0D) and vary in phase relationship and frequency. The phase relationship and size/dimension determine the geometry. The frequencies determine the qualities and attributes, such as colour, emotions, and also the degree of integration or fractal level. Remember, anything we can imagine is not just represented by this wave function but is a wave function---a pattern or patterns of vibrations. These are all packets of information.

Note that the information is not associated (as though appended) in the geometrical oscillations in the manner that man's artificial coding systems associate meaning, letters, symbols with computer processes (using the binary system). The information is the geometric intelligence of the wave function's oscillations.

Now how does the mind's 'read' and 'write' processes work in nature? An oscillation or wave can be considered to be a read pulse if it impinges on a wave function and resonates with the wave function or certain components of waves within it. By resonance we mean it occurs as a result of similar frequencies---oscillations in phase. Such a signal resonating with, say, the internal structure of the wave function can act as a key (a principal feature in genetics processes?). Corresponding waves inherent within the resultant oscillation of the wave function are caused to be separated out as in a Fourier analysis. These waves now become active to do work or act as an instruction signal for some other entity. The separated waves may, however, still have complex modulations and they are still wave functions. Different whole wave functions could resonate, or merely their parts.

A 'write' pulse, such as anyone's thoughts, will radiate wave functions to be recorded in the countless vortices of spacetime. Some media store information easier than others. Stone, quartz, bone, and water are considered high in storage capabilities, that is, their own oscillations can easily be modulated by appropriately related signals.

Returning to the example of coordination in skills, a big problem is how a large amount of information can be stored nonlinearly. We might consider for instance the long sequence of complex movements which must be stored for a concert pianist to play a concerto. Scientists have already recognised that these sequences are clearly not stored linearly---this would be extremely inefficient and impractical.

Consider an analogy with computers. Let the harddrive storage have the full memory of the movements to play the concerto. It is all there, all at once. But now we wish to apply this memory, that is download to the temporary memory, RAM, where a portion of the data on the harddrive will now appear on the screen (imagine all of this portion can appear on the screen). We perceive this data, which is immediately available, all at once (on the screen). This corresponds to the learning pattern or wave function. Consciousness grasps within the conscious mind and the margin of consciousness a spread in time of information---the full learning pattern or wave function, all at once. In the computer analogy, as we look at the screen, we can see all the text at once and imagine reading text from the top to the bottom one word at a time. This is the conscious mind playing off one bit in time of the wave function. But as one gets to the end of the learning pattern (the end of the text) the wave function 'moves' along in time (the harddrive loads another page). But to be more accurate with the analogy the change is actually not discrete. The wave function steadily and continuously 'moves' forward (the harddrive is loading steadily all the time as the lines of text are read---the top line disappears and the new bottom line appears). Thus the wave function or learning pattern bridges the dimensional gap between the total memory (the harddrive) and the sharp focus of application, the single movement (or reading of the text). The wave function thus is a transducer of energies. Its holographic properties have enabled it to convert a portion of holistic energy (higher-dimensional) to one bit at a time in our 3D space and time. The higher the skill of the person the greater is this span in time (and space, which is the same as time within the learning pattern)---the computer monitor screen can hold more text. This is a proper definition of skill or instrumental technique---how many movements can be spanned simultaneously with the mind. Everything else falls into place---density of information is higher, coordination is better, speed of movement is easier and faster, etc. Imagine reading the text on the screen faster than the harddrive can load it---you can't of course, and the span of the learning pattern determines the ability.

Thus the wave function as a learning pattern is a mechanism that enables one to translate holistic programs into linear ones within 3D space and time. In a nutshell, the learning pattern is a 4D holographic template that houses programmes and converts nonlinear information into linear information.

Now how is the information for the concerto stored in the 'harddrive'? It is clearly all there, all at once. We say it must be stored cyclically in the periphery of the vortices as alluded to previously. One can picture the information going round in circles indefinitely, the simultaneity of which can be handled with higher dimensions, but to tap it off or access it the learning pattern or wave function must link this level to enable it to be expressed in material reality---actually playing the concerto.

This is a very difficult subject and these articles are very brief. As a final note we might add that an important field of research would be to connect the wave function---the quantum computer---as described here, with the central nervous system, in particular, with muscular activity. We don't exactly know how the field system (of wave functions) links with the muscular actions.

SELF-REFERENCING SYSTEMS AND THE RELATIVE ZERO, Noel Huntley, Ph.D.

Consciousness can be observed to operate in quantum states, meaning it manifests whole, holistic, gestalt perceptive frames, whether there is a sharp point-like focus or there is a uniform spread. Moreover, these states of consciousness rapidly switch from one focus to another, giving the impression of continuity, time and the presence of gradients. Nevertheless, consciousness can become fixated, or be specifically hypnotised. It then forms a closed, self-referencing system. This is what we are interested in: self-referencing systems. The parallel concept for this in technology, that is, machines, is 'closed systems'. We shall come back to this.

Where does the idea of zero come into all this? In effect, a self-referencing system has given itself a zero context at its boundaries---at its interface with any greater system within which it resides. In fact as far as the self-referencing system is concerned there is nothing outside itself---hence the use of the term zero.

When we design a meter to take measurements we put a zero on the scale which acts as the reference for the quantitative evaluation by means of numbers on the scale or dial---say, for example, 4 or 5 units of measurement. We always set the pointer to zero before measuring and we then assume this is an absolute zero. Clearly it is zero for our immediate reality but it will only be relative to the environmental set-up. How do we know it isn't a zero reference with respect to some greater context? For example, are the physical constants of science really constant? What about Einstein's General Relativity---doesn't this resolve any doubt here? Scientists will find that the existing Relativity is part of a larger one, but it is set up as is all physics and mathematics so that the self-referencing system appears to be the only one.

Let us give an analogy which just happens to be similar to ones that are given in describing Relativity but here we are revealing the larger relativity (one fractal level higher). Consider a train compartment. In this case we have a smooth running coach and the blinds are down. There is no evidence of not only motion of the carriage but no evidence that there is any existence beyond the interior of the compartment.

If we measure velocities of, say, simple hand motions from side to side we will think these results are absolute (remember, this is only an analogy and 'velocity' is a suitable metaphor). If we wish to take the velocity measurement a little more literally, it means we have measured the velocity relative to the boundaries of our system---the compartment---which we take as zero. (Note that in our real universe we normally measure velocities relative to our planet, which is taken as stationary, or measure our planet's motion relative to 'fixed' stars.)

In the train compartment we do not realise that the boundary of our system---the walls, floor, roof---are an interface to a larger system which we may peek at for a moment through a crack in the blinds. Clearly if we measure the velocity of the same hand motion from the larger perspective---outside the train---the result will be different. Thus the first result was relative and not absolute. Similarly, physical constants of science will be found to be relative values.

The reality within the train compartment is a lower fractal dimension and the greater 'outside' reality is a higher fractal. Are there more? Yes, it would not be logical to consider only two, but we are getting ahead. More examples must be given to enable the reader to grasp this subject. As a contrast so that the reader develops a broad view of this concept and assimilates the extensive, in fact, all pervasive scope of this concept, let us give a qualitative example.

We can all perceive when another person is prejudiced or biassed, since we are outside the 'system'. But the prejudiced person dramatising a self-referencing system can't see this. They generally can't step outside of themselves to reset the programme; that means, connect the data up to a new context---the greater perspective in which the irrational relationships become obvious. They are in a kind of hypnotic trance.

Consciousness, however, always has the potential to step outside itself (the lower level), since it is fractalised, as is everything natural---see articles on fractals. The self-referencing system in the above example of the prejudiced person will zero out the bias, meaning the person will be unconscious that their evaluation (behaviour) is based on unconscious irrational data. In the case of the train compartment example, the contribution in the measurement made by, or provided by, the larger context or outside (the train) view, will be zeroed out if the occupants of the compartment are only aware of the interior. The self-referencing system will judge all unknown contexts as zero. Let us give more analogies. The see-saw example is a good one.

Imagine a plank balanced on a fulcrum with a person seated on either end. The characteristic motions of the plank are governed by the fulcrum---this is the zero point. If we consider measuring the amount of rocking of the plank, that is, the amplitude, this measurement references the context of the still point of the fulcrum. We can imagine this is a complete and closed system: such as this third dimension or even an environmental set-up in which rigorous scientific methodology is being applied. The results will appear absolute. But if we now realise that this first fractal system, the plank, fulcrum and persons, is on the end of a larger plank and fulcrum, with persons on the other end, then our new zero reference is the second fulcrum. The first fulcrum is now moving up and down. We see that the result of the measurement made in the first system will now be different when we reference the context of the second system and the new zero (fulcrum). Thus the first zero was only relative. Similarly for the second fulcrum and so on to a complete system. The fractals do not continue indefinitely just as a twig on a tree is connected to a larger branch, which in turn is connected to a still larger branch and so on, but completes in the full integration at the tree trunk.

On the subject of trees, a further example could be a bough of a tree moving in the wind. The twig on the end traverses the longest arc. Let's call the twig the first fractal. Then the twig is connected to a branch---the second fractal---which in turn is connected to a larger branch---the third fractal. Each incrementing fractal moves less than the previous one. Thus we could say that the twig is not 'aware' beyond itself, that is, of the second fractal and higher, and it will regard its own motion relative to its connection to the second fractal, which it takes as zero (motion). Thus the twig in this analogy only experiences its own minimal movement but which in fact is being carried by the accumulation of the other motions of the branches.

The human arm is a similar system. The joints give us the fractal levels. If we imagine arm motions where all joints---shoulder, elbow, wrist and fingers---are active, we know from results achieved in experimental psychology that the fingers have their own learning patterns; the wrist has its own learning pattern, plus the fingers; the elbow has elbow, wrist and finger learning patterns, and the shoulder joint has them all. Thus the fingers, say, moving on a keyboard, have their own closed self-referencing fractal level. They can only move up and down and are not 'aware' of being dragged to one side by, say, the shoulder action. Learning can't pass up the hierarchy from fingers to shoulder; only down. See other fractal articles and instrumental technique.

The twig is also a good analogy for human consciousness, which is connected to the second fractal level, the 'soul', and so on. The human consciousness is only aware of its third dimensional activities, and not its greater fractal selves. Owing to excessive negativity on this planet the connection between human fractal and soul fractal is weak and thus the human consciousness is extremely vulnerable to the creation of a closed, self-referencing system.

We may now see how our meter may only be referencing a relative zero. Our objective scientific methodology creates a closed, self-referencing system. The observer/observed relationship is an interdependent one---it is context dependent. Only relative results can be achieved. Our so-called constants are merely values which reference the interface (boundary) between one system and the next, which because there is no awareness of the larger (next) system or dimensions, the reference is automatically zeroed out.

The formulation of scientific data reaches its limit in the very objective set-up it creates. The conditions of objectivity set up an experimental reality involving devices and experimental arrangement, designed on the basis of objective knowledge---all with emphasis on 'seeing is believing'. Such a set-up predetermines what nature will reveal to us. This system will self-reference, forming a closed environment. Compare the first see-saw, referencing the fulcrum as a zero or the twig only 'aware' of its own movement. The more objective we make the elements of the experimental environment the more consciousness denies its participation, but, nevertheless, it is connected like the dog chasing its own tail. It creates a closed system. To reveal perpetual motion one must create knowingly, or accidentally, a 'leak' out of the system. The first see-saw and its relative data is violated by finding a link out of the first system to the next (fulcrum).

This level of scientific methodology will give us the constant of the velocity of light, Planck's constant, the conservation of energy, etc. but will automatically fail to incorporate features outside the first system. The more positive and thorough the experimental set-up, the more it will be limited to its own context and not even a glimmer of the next fractal level will be present. However, in using the train analogy, if we get a glimpse of the passing environment through the gap in the blinds, our internal observations are changed since one has in effect stepped outside the system. Intuition and imaginative states of mind interacting with the first objective environment may cause a different selection of data to occur (a change in selection of probabilities), and the experimentalist may find he or she obtains a different result, which note, may to their great frustration not be reproducible. The 3D objective environment was, unknowingly, modified and the 'desirable' hidden influence (on the first fractal from the greater system) removed; that which is not part of the established formalism.

For example, the non-graduate scientific pioneer is more likely to design a set-up in which a normally closed Newtonian, non-perpetual motion device has a flaw in it in which certain unknown elements of the design are manifesting an open-system characteristic, with the subsequent anomaly of, say, the production of extra energy---and the potential for perpetual motion.

The basis of this is that the environment changes according to the spectrum of consciousness. The subjects of psychotronics and radionics are examples in which because of the above reasons, results may not be reproducible by all investigators---often the same person. In some circumstances, the conscious observation itself may cause the system not to work in that way. It is easy to see why strict objective conditions stifle ESP and paranormal energies. If the activity is allowed to operate without analysis it may work. Paranormal energies are outside the first (3D) system and our stringent, scientific, objective conditions determine the frequency range---the lower one. Similarly, understanding of art (and music) can only occur when analysis is not taking place---and in fact when the attention is out of focus. Such conscious and intellectual analysis will quantum reduce the holistic (unified) aesthetics of the art to the particle level---phase correlation to phase randomisation, to use a quantum physics expression.

When we set objective standards we create a 'zero' from which to judge anything or measure anything. Collective agreement and programming sets the 'zero' and we don't know there is already a bias in our judgement. We could take a negative situation---the state of the society, or supposing everyone was a thief---and use this as an objective standard to evaluate behaviour. This becomes programmed and embedded. As stated previously, when programmed there is a self-referenced system which zeros out the bias or prejudice, and everything seems normal.

Whenever we judge a standard we put a 'mark' on an imaginary gradient scale ranging from 'good' to 'bad', and use this as the context---the zero---by which to make the judgement. The point chosen (usually subconsciously) is a relative interface between 'good' and 'bad' and is a zero mark for judgement of how many degrees of 'bad' if it is on the 'bad' side of the mark, or how many degrees of 'good' if it is on the 'good' side of the mark.

Returning to the problem of the closed systems of scientific methodology, are we therefore saying that experimental conditions shouldn't be rigorous---that one should be sloppy with the design, etc? In our present condition, there is no satisfactory answer. We have strayed so far from a correct balance between subjectivity and objectivity, or the symbiosis between knowledge and consciousness. As knowledge expands, it should not have veered unduly towards the objective but retained an ideal ratio with subjectivity. By this, we mean there should have been an increasing recognition (in evolution) of the role of the mind, and its power and participation in the environment. Now we have the unsatisfactory situation in which a pioneer with lack of strict adherence to scientific and experimental protocol is more likely to make the really valuable discoveries. Note that when they are made they are suppressed.

Science hasn't established that there are (macro) dimensions within dimensions forming a hierarchy of frequency spectrums (scalar wave). It is a little like living in a box, the first fractal, which is within the next fractal, a larger box and so on. There must always be correct alignment between adjacent fractal levels, between contextual strata, otherwise chaos will result. Our sector of the universe appears to be designed on the basis of twelve main divisions or dimensions. The DNA is said to have the potential for 12 strands, and we have many existing 'twelves', such as the notes on the musical scale. However, note that we should have been using base-12 for mathematics, and not decimal, that is, base-10. This itself will cause results, significant numbers, physical 'constants', of science and mathematics to be out of alignment with our environmental dimensional structures. The '10' configuration will not fit into the '12' of nature for a natural resonance and synchronicity, and for a proper progression of discoveries towards a harmonic science. Similarly, distortions in the mind will cause chaos and insanity.

Let us finalise with another analogy, in particular, to show us a mechanistic interpretation of synchronous activities and which also shows how the interface between different levels or loops should zero out for correct alignment. We have the example of the production of the television image. The electron beam of the cathode ray tube is focussed into a sharp point. It strikes the screen at the top left corner, creating a fluorescing spot of coloured light, then moves across, horizontally. When it reaches the right side it jumps to the left just below the previous line and continues to do this 615 times until the whole screen has been traversed. Then at the bottom right corner it returns to the top left corner and begins again. One may notice that we have 615 smaller loops---the horizontal lines---inside a larger loop, which brings the spot back to the beginning. It may be seen that the points of return must be precise. At the end of the lines there is a synchronous pulse applied which returns the spot for each line, and then there is a second synchronous pulse which returns it for the whole picture. If these pulses were out of phase the picture would go into chaos. The loops must be zeroed, that is, aligned at the precise time.

Since everything is made up of flowing energy and under continuous creation, it must be precisely structured in the above manner, whether it is coordination of the fractal joints of the human arms, or the dimensional organisation of the universe, following a base-12 code.