Consciousness can be observed to operate in quantum states, meaning it manifests whole, holistic, gestalt perceptive frames, whether there is a sharp point-like focus or there is a uniform spread. Moreover, these states of consciousness rapidly switch from one focus to another, giving the impression of continuity, time and the presence of gradients. Nevertheless, consciousness can become fixated, or be specifically hypnotised. It then forms a closed, self-referencing system. This is what we are interested in: self-referencing systems. The parallel concept for this in technology, that is, machines, is 'closed systems'. We shall come back to this.
Where does the idea of zero come into all this? In effect, a self-referencing system has given itself a zero context at its boundaries---at its interface with any greater system within which it resides. In fact as far as the self-referencing system is concerned there is nothing outside itself---hence the use of the term zero.
When we design a meter to take measurements we put a zero on the scale which acts as the reference for the quantitative evaluation by means of numbers on the scale or dial---say, for example, 4 or 5 units of measurement. We always set the pointer to zero before measuring and we then assume this is an absolute zero. Clearly it is zero for our immediate reality but it will only be relative to the environmental set-up. How do we know it isn't a zero reference with respect to some greater context? For example, are the physical constants of science really constant? What about Einstein's General Relativity---doesn't this resolve any doubt here? Scientists will find that the existing Relativity is part of a larger one, but it is set up as is all physics and mathematics so that the self-referencing system appears to be the only one.
Let us give an analogy which just happens to be similar to ones that are given in describing Relativity but here we are revealing the larger relativity (one fractal level higher). Consider a train compartment. In this case we have a smooth running coach and the blinds are down. There is no evidence of not only motion of the carriage but no evidence that there is any existence beyond the interior of the compartment.
If we measure velocities of, say, simple hand motions from side to side we will think these results are absolute (remember, this is only an analogy and 'velocity' is a suitable metaphor). If we wish to take the velocity measurement a little more literally, it means we have measured the velocity relative to the boundaries of our system---the compartment---which we take as zero. (Note that in our real universe we normally measure velocities relative to our planet, which is taken as stationary, or measure our planet's motion relative to 'fixed' stars.)
In the train compartment we do not realise that the boundary of our system---the walls, floor, roof---are an interface to a larger system which we may peek at for a moment through a crack in the blinds. Clearly if we measure the velocity of the same hand motion from the larger perspective---outside the train---the result will be different. Thus the first result was relative and not absolute. Similarly, physical constants of science will be found to be relative values.
The reality within the train compartment is a lower fractal dimension and the greater 'outside' reality is a higher fractal. Are there more? Yes, it would not be logical to consider only two, but we are getting ahead. More examples must be given to enable the reader to grasp this subject. As a contrast so that the reader develops a broad view of this concept and assimilates the extensive, in fact, all pervasive scope of this concept, let us give a qualitative example.
We can all perceive when another person is prejudiced or biassed, since we are outside the 'system'. But the prejudiced person dramatising a self-referencing system can't see this. They generally can't step outside of themselves to reset the programme; that means, connect the data up to a new context---the greater perspective in which the irrational relationships become obvious. They are in a kind of hypnotic trance.
Consciousness, however, always has the potential to step outside itself (the lower level), since it is fractalised, as is everything natural---see articles on fractals. The self-referencing system in the above example of the prejudiced person will zero out the bias, meaning the person will be unconscious that their evaluation (behaviour) is based on unconscious irrational data. In the case of the train compartment example, the contribution in the measurement made by, or provided by, the larger context or outside (the train) view, will be zeroed out if the occupants of the compartment are only aware of the interior. The self-referencing system will judge all unknown contexts as zero. Let us give more analogies. The see-saw example is a good one.
Imagine a plank balanced on a fulcrum with a person seated on either end. The characteristic motions of the plank are governed by the fulcrum---this is the zero point. If we consider measuring the amount of rocking of the plank, that is, the amplitude, this measurement references the context of the still point of the fulcrum. We can imagine this is a complete and closed system: such as this third dimension or even an environmental set-up in which rigorous scientific methodology is being applied. The results will appear absolute. But if we now realise that this first fractal system, the plank, fulcrum and persons, is on the end of a larger plank and fulcrum, with persons on the other end, then our new zero reference is the second fulcrum. The first fulcrum is now moving up and down. We see that the result of the measurement made in the first system will now be different when we reference the context of the second system and the new zero (fulcrum). Thus the first zero was only relative. Similarly for the second fulcrum and so on to a complete system. The fractals do not continue indefinitely just as a twig on a tree is connected to a larger branch, which in turn is connected to a still larger branch and so on, but completes in the full integration at the tree trunk.
On the subject of trees, a further example could be a bough of a tree moving in the wind. The twig on the end traverses the longest arc. Let's call the twig the first fractal. Then the twig is connected to a branch---the second fractal---which in turn is connected to a larger branch---the third fractal. Each incrementing fractal moves less than the previous one. Thus we could say that the twig is not 'aware' beyond itself, that is, of the second fractal and higher, and it will regard its own motion relative to its connection to the second fractal, which it takes as zero (motion). Thus the twig in this analogy only experiences its own minimal movement but which in fact is being carried by the accumulation of the other motions of the branches.
The human arm is a similar system. The joints give us the fractal levels. If we imagine arm motions where all joints---shoulder, elbow, wrist and fingers---are active, we know from results achieved in experimental psychology that the fingers have their own learning patterns; the wrist has its own learning pattern, plus the fingers; the elbow has elbow, wrist and finger learning patterns, and the shoulder joint has them all. Thus the fingers, say, moving on a keyboard, have their own closed self-referencing fractal level. They can only move up and down and are not 'aware' of being dragged to one side by, say, the shoulder action. Learning can't pass up the hierarchy from fingers to shoulder; only down. See other fractal articles and instrumental technique.
The twig is also a good analogy for human consciousness, which is connected to the second fractal level, the 'soul', and so on. The human consciousness is only aware of its third dimensional activities, and not its greater fractal selves. Owing to excessive negativity on this planet the connection between human fractal and soul fractal is weak and thus the human consciousness is extremely vulnerable to the creation of a closed, self-referencing system.
We may now see how our meter may only be referencing a relative zero. Our objective scientific methodology creates a closed, self-referencing system. The observer/observed relationship is an interdependent one---it is context dependent. Only relative results can be achieved. Our so-called constants are merely values which reference the interface (boundary) between one system and the next, which because there is no awareness of the larger (next) system or dimensions, the reference is automatically zeroed out.
The formulation of scientific data reaches its limit in the very objective set-up it creates. The conditions of objectivity set up an experimental reality involving devices and experimental arrangement, designed on the basis of objective knowledge---all with emphasis on 'seeing is believing'. Such a set-up predetermines what nature will reveal to us. This system will self-reference, forming a closed environment. Compare the first see-saw, referencing the fulcrum as a zero or the twig only 'aware' of its own movement. The more objective we make the elements of the experimental environment the more consciousness denies its participation, but, nevertheless, it is connected like the dog chasing its own tail. It creates a closed system. To reveal perpetual motion one must create knowingly, or accidentally, a 'leak' out of the system. The first see-saw and its relative data is violated by finding a link out of the first system to the next (fulcrum).
This level of scientific methodology will give us the constant of the velocity of light, Planck's constant, the conservation of energy, etc. but will automatically fail to incorporate features outside the first system. The more positive and thorough the experimental set-up, the more it will be limited to its own context and not even a glimmer of the next fractal level will be present. However, in using the train analogy, if we get a glimpse of the passing environment through the gap in the blinds, our internal observations are changed since one has in effect stepped outside the system. Intuition and imaginative states of mind interacting with the first objective environment may cause a different selection of data to occur (a change in selection of probabilities), and the experimentalist may find he or she obtains a different result, which note, may to their great frustration not be reproducible. The 3D objective environment was, unknowingly, modified and the 'desirable' hidden influence (on the first fractal from the greater system) removed; that which is not part of the established formalism.
For example, the non-graduate scientific pioneer is more likely to design a set-up in which a normally closed Newtonian, non-perpetual motion device has a flaw in it in which certain unknown elements of the design are manifesting an open-system characteristic, with the subsequent anomaly of, say, the production of extra energy---and the potential for perpetual motion.
The basis of this is that the environment changes according to the spectrum of consciousness. The subjects of psychotronics and radionics are examples in which because of the above reasons, results may not be reproducible by all investigators---often the same person. In some circumstances, the conscious observation itself may cause the system not to work in that way. It is easy to see why strict objective conditions stifle ESP and paranormal energies. If the activity is allowed to operate without analysis it may work. Paranormal energies are outside the first (3D) system and our stringent, scientific, objective conditions determine the frequency range---the lower one. Similarly, understanding of art (and music) can only occur when analysis is not taking place---and in fact when the attention is out of focus. Such conscious and intellectual analysis will quantum reduce the holistic (unified) aesthetics of the art to the particle level---phase correlation to phase randomisation, to use a quantum physics expression.
When we set objective standards we create a 'zero' from which to judge anything or measure anything. Collective agreement and programming sets the 'zero' and we don't know there is already a bias in our judgement. We could take a negative situation---the state of the society, or supposing everyone was a thief---and use this as an objective standard to evaluate behaviour. This becomes programmed and embedded. As stated previously, when programmed there is a self-referenced system which zeros out the bias or prejudice, and everything seems normal.
Whenever we judge a standard we put a 'mark' on an imaginary gradient scale ranging from 'good' to 'bad', and use this as the context---the zero---by which to make the judgement. The point chosen (usually subconsciously) is a relative interface between 'good' and 'bad' and is a zero mark for judgement of how many degrees of 'bad' if it is on the 'bad' side of the mark, or how many degrees of 'good' if it is on the 'good' side of the mark.
Returning to the problem of the closed systems of scientific methodology, are we therefore saying that experimental conditions shouldn't be rigorous---that one should be sloppy with the design, etc? In our present condition, there is no satisfactory answer. We have strayed so far from a correct balance between subjectivity and objectivity, or the symbiosis between knowledge and consciousness. As knowledge expands, it should not have veered unduly towards the objective but retained an ideal ratio with subjectivity. By this, we mean there should have been an increasing recognition (in evolution) of the role of the mind, and its power and participation in the environment. Now we have the unsatisfactory situation in which a pioneer with lack of strict adherence to scientific and experimental protocol is more likely to make the really valuable discoveries. Note that when they are made they are suppressed.
Science hasn't established that there are (macro) dimensions within dimensions forming a hierarchy of frequency spectrums (scalar wave). It is a little like living in a box, the first fractal, which is within the next fractal, a larger box and so on. There must always be correct alignment between adjacent fractal levels, between contextual strata, otherwise chaos will result. Our sector of the universe appears to be designed on the basis of twelve main divisions or dimensions. The DNA is said to have the potential for 12 strands, and we have many existing 'twelves', such as the notes on the musical scale. However, note that we should have been using base-12 for mathematics, and not decimal, that is, base-10. This itself will cause results, significant numbers, physical 'constants', of science and mathematics to be out of alignment with our environmental dimensional structures. The '10' configuration will not fit into the '12' of nature for a natural resonance and synchronicity, and for a proper progression of discoveries towards a harmonic science. Similarly, distortions in the mind will cause chaos and insanity.
Let us finalise with another analogy, in particular, to show us a mechanistic interpretation of synchronous activities and which also shows how the interface between different levels or loops should zero out for correct alignment. We have the example of the production of the television image. The electron beam of the cathode ray tube is focussed into a sharp point. It strikes the screen at the top left corner, creating a fluorescing spot of coloured light, then moves across, horizontally. When it reaches the right side it jumps to the left just below the previous line and continues to do this 615 times until the whole screen has been traversed. Then at the bottom right corner it returns to the top left corner and begins again. One may notice that we have 615 smaller loops---the horizontal lines---inside a larger loop, which brings the spot back to the beginning. It may be seen that the points of return must be precise. At the end of the lines there is a synchronous pulse applied which returns the spot for each line, and then there is a second synchronous pulse which returns it for the whole picture. If these pulses were out of phase the picture would go into chaos. The loops must be zeroed, that is, aligned at the precise time.
Since everything is made up of flowing energy and under continuous creation, it must be precisely structured in the above manner, whether it is coordination of the fractal joints of the human arms, or the dimensional organisation of the universe, following a base-12 code.
Krystal Rap with Speaker Louis S. Luzzo, Sr. ©™ is a Christos Guardian Alliance Information Portal. Food for the Mind, Body and Soul. The beginning of a fascinating journey to discover your true Human Origins, your Human Spirit, new Revelations and Truths about your past and of the coming New Age. 🙏
Friday, April 22, 2022
SUPPRESSION OF INNER SPACE, Noel Huntley, Ph.D.
We are referring to the denial of the presence of an 'inner' space underlying our materialistic external 3D world and the suppression of all significant knowledge relating to it.
To give the reader a simple picture or analogy, imagine looking down on the ocean, of which the water is not clear, and only the surface can be seen. Realise a considerable depth below this surface, noting the potential presence of multifarious activities or events in the ocean depths.
Science and educational knowledge generally, is similarly only observing the 'surface' (3D) of the universe and environment. That is, we look at the ocean (universe, etc.) and believe it is just the surface—which manifests effects only from the depths (inner space). This should be sufficient to condition the reader, where needed, to realise how elementary human knowledge is and how vast inner (higher) space is.
The reader unfamiliar with dimensions will note that the hidden 'inner space' under the ocean's surface is easy to visualise, but will ask where the real inner space is. Unfortunately our 3D perception and linear consciousness does not allow us to detect directly this inner space, which goes inwards at every point in space and would require at least an additional dimension of perception.
Are there any well-established examples of inner space? The blackhole phenomenon is well accepted in modern science and considerable research has been conducted into the nature of blackholes. Thus the reader can try to picture a hole in space which goes inwards, not along any of our three dimensions. This also applies to wormholes, and scientists speculate that these holes may link directly with other universe planes or curve back into our universe at some great linear 3D distance, but giving an almost instant connection through the inner-space pathways (wormholes).
Some physicists have speculated that our space is riddled with mini-blackholes (energy going inwards) and mini-whiteholes (energy coming out—such as the energy of a star but also the nucleus of an atom giving the positive charge). Thus we need at least an extra dimension of space to explain such phenomena.
We are showing that there is space which we can't perceive (with our limited frequency spectrum of consciousness). Also that there has been an inevitable degree of recognition of an inner space (blackholes) but where these ideas are seen as forming an underlying structure to external 3D space the acceptance ceases; closing the lid on 3D effects only, as being complete, even absolute rather than relative to its context (of 3D). Even the quantum reality of quantum physics is relegated to a fictional product of mathematics.
Let us take as an example of the type of subtle control that is occurring over knowledge. Maxwell's electromagnetic equations, the rockbed of electromagnetics, are taught in university physics and mathematics; one may wonder how many professors realise that these equations being taught are not the original ones of Maxwell. It is fairly well known, essentially outside academic circles, that physicists Gibbs and Heaviside removed from these equations the quaternions or scalar-wave terms—very much with the approval of Hertz.
The scalar terms have been refered to as expressing 5D etheric waves that are non-vector, and are oscillating electrostatic potential energy waves, which are longitudinal. The terms left untouched in the equations being taught today are the transverse Hertzian electromagnetic vector terms, very much detectable in our 3D space. Gibbs and Heaviside simply couldn't see the point of the additional scalar terms underlying the vector EM terms, since current physics formulations were supporting a 3D closed system and seemingly successsfully, and already precluded the possible role of these original terms since the existing premises of physics had no part for them; not recognising that they were supposed to elevate established scientific models to a higher order. At a deeper level, however, this does not imply it was entirely a mistake to remove the terms—meaning it is part of the ongoing suppression of inner-space reality.
Let us briefly digress to a contrasting example within religion, in particular, Christianity. The Bible reveals that Jesus used the word 'within' frequently, of which the proper meaning is not being taught to day; for example 'The Father within'. This concept of 'within' does not mean something intangible or lacking in existence, substance or dimension, or even a science. Ironically, however, it does mean atheists are correct; there is no (external) God. Thus again the role of inner space, which relates to inner consciousness, remains hidden.
Now going back to the scalar wave. It extends dimensionally beyond 3D, for example, it can wave in time, and affect 3D time. The frame of mind giving rise to the removal of the scalar terms from Maxwell's equations is of the same negative motivation which the great Nicola Tesla encountered early last century. Tesla, undoubtedly the father of electricity, whose name was removed from anything academically educational, discovered the real nature of radio transmission—not even taught today. At that time the German scientist Hertz was gaining recognition after his success in transmitting radio signals from one room to another. Tesla had realised that electromagnetic waves, which are transverse (sometimes referred to as Hertz waves today), attenuated too rapidly to transmit information over great distances. Tesla discovered that the longitudinal scalar wave was the underlying carrier wave for significant distances. Even though Hertz waves are detected around transmitters and receivers it was the scalar wave, propagating mainly through the ground and on the surface, and capable of pair coupling into EM Hertz waves, that was the dominant cause of radio transmission.
In fact in the early days of this research, Tesla in his enthusiasm for scientific truths took the long trip from the U.S. to Germany to meet Hertz. When returning, Tesla recounted on the train his immense regret of the visit. His enthusiasm had blinded him to the deflating effect his knowledge and convictions, regarding the role of scalar waves, would have on Hertz.
Nevertheless, as we know today, Tesla's theory was rejected by the obstinate and controlled academic community and Hertz received full accolade for his work to the degree that his name became the unit of cycles per second.
Science is cleverly rigged to ridicule any phenomena beyond the external-world or 3D spectrum. If we use the analogy given in previous articles of the dog chasing its own tail, the observer being the dog's head, observing its tail as apparently objective and separate from its head, in fact, part of the environment or universe, we can see that greater truth about the tail can be obtained via the 'subjective' inner-space connection of the dog's head, linked (physically) through the body to the tail. Similarly we observe the environment as objective and external to us, but in fact our consciousness is linked to the environment through inner space which is basically all mind anyway.
Science struggles to continue its denial of all such phenomena: ETs who exist and operate in these other spectrums of inner space; all spiritual phenomena; religion's evil spirits; the energies of the paranormal; ESP, etc. The human consciousness is a spectrum of frequencies, like a wave band, and functions in a similar manner to the antenna on the roof. When selecting a channel for the television, an adjustment is made to the tuning circuit and the antenna resonates with a particular wave band or spectrum of frequencies which now creates the television picture. Change the channel and the wave band selected by the antenna changes and we have a different picture. Similarly if we changed our consciousness frequencies we could tune into a different spectrum of inner space and perceive a different reality there.
This should be elementary physics or at least serious speculation based on existing verifiable knowledge. Why do we call it 'inner space' if it has its own objectivity? Our 3D as it exists today would be manifesting about the maximum objectivity if we were to measure the coefficient of objectivity (objectivity + subjectivity = 1; as objectivity decreases, subjectivity increases). The average person has no awareness of their inner roll in participating in their environmental existence.
Let us attempt to convey an understanding of this by using a simple analogy. Figure 1, in going from (a) to (d), shows increasing amounts of inner space, that is, increasing subjectivity and therefore decreasing objectivity. The figures are intended to follow up on the dog/tail analogy but with a little more clarity. Figure 1(a) depicts the 3D external-world observed phenomena, showing the simple surface, or linear connection between observer and object. Mainstream physics operates at this level. The observer can only know about the object by transfer of information across 3D space (the arrow between them).
Now Figure 1(b) includes a structural feature of consciousness, showing the inner-space condition. Figure 1(b) illustrates that a second order of information about the object, superimposed on the normal and aware linear transmission, is being expressed by the observer (the direction of the arrows might be considered both ways). This may occur via intuition.
Similarly Figure 1(c) and (d) show further higher orders of information representing greater development, awareness, or evolution of the observer. The increasing orders are increasing degrees of 'subjectivity' or mind linkage. This 'pyramid' of dots in Figure 1 should be imagined as infinitely dense and extended. The actual inner consciousness will extend through these fractal and collective levels, ultimately to their source.
It is interesting to note the way the macro-level of existence reflects the same physics principles as the micro-level and vice versa. The above configuration in Figure 1 is also the essence of how the learning pattern functions in skills (see articles on skills/physical mobility), in particular, in transducing 4D nonlinearity into linear 3D sequences.
If point A wasn't unconscious to the observer it would enable the observer to know completely the object below by means of A and lower orders of connecting information. We are not saying that humans could perceive these higher orders while in our 3D frequency spectrum (our world), though if they could they would already have left this quantitative dimension and 'ascended' to a higher realm—higher degree of the fractal matrix.
Figure 1(a) would give maximum objectivity (which in the limit is linearity) but (d) would give maximum subjectivity (nonlinearity in the limit). Between these two extremes is the gradient. But as the reader can see, the linearity is an illusion since the hierarchy behind it—Figures (b) to (d)—exists always but is unconscious, manifesting apparent objectivity. 'Objectivity' is synonymous here with 'unconscious' (the unconscious connection to the object). As one shifts from Figure 1(a) to (d), comprehension goes from external to within (inner space).
The introduction of inner space would of course require new physics premises. The basis of linear fractals would be recognised to be due to the nonlinear, internal, inner-space, fractal relationships, and would be understood much better. Furthermore, zero-point energy, the turbulent energetic state of vacuum, could be considered as beyond our immediate 3D, that is, its source would be. Thus again the acknowledgement of strata beyond our 3D 'surface', giving rise to so much energy, previously considered as zero, has been delayed, or more correctly belayed.
Another excellent scientific example of a source of energy not being identified is the laser. For simplicity consider ten rays of white light. They are not in coherence (in-phase frequencies). The total power or intensity is equal to about three rays added together. However, if we make the ten rays coherent—crescents and troughs of waves in step—the power increases. But it is much greater than the sum of each ray (10)—the current scientific explanation. It is apparently at least the square of ten, that is, a hundred times. The ten rays, now in resonance, quantum regenerate a higher fractal, that is, rekindle from the virtual state Fractal Matrix gradient a more powerful vortex, which is of higher frequency and not in the visible spectrum. The ten rays of light are now sub-harmonics of this higher-dimensional vortex, of which the latter manifests in the inner space.
Further examples range into 'genuine' errors in physics but again concealing the scalar wave. Let's charge a small sphere, say, positive (electrostatic charge) and bring up a point test charge, say, negative, to measure the field charge around the sphere. The point charge reacts with a vector force towards the sphere and we say there is an electric force there. Move the test charge around the space and we identify a complete electric field E around the sphere. But do we? This is current physics. Can we assume the electric field was there before we put in the test charge. No. Science will find that the prior field is an electrostatic scalar-wave potential. Similarly for the gravitational field. Place an object in the gravitational field, but hold it there, or let it rest on the surface of the Earth, and we measure a gravitational force. But gravity is not a gravitational force unless it is acting on an object. It is a scalar field—a property of 4D and inner space.
We might add to the list that animal abilities are not placed in the category of the paranormal. (Note that appropriately mind energies are scalar.) Only methods are researched and explanations given which incorporate existing, extremely limiting materialistic 3D linear physics principles: simple magnetic-field systems around pigeons to explain their homing abilities, chemical senses to explain olfactory detection by insects over relatively considerable distances, etc.
Let us not forget the experience of improbable 'meaningful coincidences', which are relegated to random coincidences, rather than investigating theories of synchronicity (meaning something has synchronised them). There is also the discrediting scientific views on life after death, and as we have indicated, the nature of God. These are all desperate attempts to avoid inner space, extended dimensions and frequencies outside our immediately detectable spectrum.
Is there any concrete data from empirical observations that justifies the materialistic viewpoint of the academic scientist? Why is there so much emphasis on the matter or particle aspect of nature? Quite apart from the control over knowledge which is blatant on this planet, there is the genuine observation and conclusion that when the specific scientific observation is made, the particle level is revealed.
It is well known in quantum physics that the process of detection results in the particle observation, even if waves are being viewed. This comes under the wave/particle duality. Our detection of the so-called quantum reality, of phase-correlation (holistic) causes a quantum reduction from this phase-correlation to our material reality of phase-randomisation. The unity aspects are converted to the quantitative particle view, and thus science erroneously establishes that the universe is comprised of particles stuck together by forces.
There is a genuine tendency therefore to believe there is only the material particle world—even the quantum reality is considered as a product of mathematical fiction by the scientists. The structure of our immediate perception and scientific instruments are such that the world of materiality appears to be the only one. It might be realised now why scientific methodology is not compatible with the nature of paranormal, phenomena, ESP, etc. It is self-defeating. The mental and physical framework of the established experimental method will 'quantum reduce' the paranormal energies to the world of particles apparently stuck together by forces, that is, with subsequent failure of the necessary integrations and resonance for the subtle energies (of inner space) to function. This is a great irony; stupidity and the cunning deception of science's role in evaluating the paranormal.
To eliminate the infinite potential of inner space from the existence of a civilisation is like severing a twig from its higher fractals of incrementing branches going back (analogy: inner space) to their source, the tree trunk.
To give the reader a simple picture or analogy, imagine looking down on the ocean, of which the water is not clear, and only the surface can be seen. Realise a considerable depth below this surface, noting the potential presence of multifarious activities or events in the ocean depths.
Science and educational knowledge generally, is similarly only observing the 'surface' (3D) of the universe and environment. That is, we look at the ocean (universe, etc.) and believe it is just the surface—which manifests effects only from the depths (inner space). This should be sufficient to condition the reader, where needed, to realise how elementary human knowledge is and how vast inner (higher) space is.
The reader unfamiliar with dimensions will note that the hidden 'inner space' under the ocean's surface is easy to visualise, but will ask where the real inner space is. Unfortunately our 3D perception and linear consciousness does not allow us to detect directly this inner space, which goes inwards at every point in space and would require at least an additional dimension of perception.
Are there any well-established examples of inner space? The blackhole phenomenon is well accepted in modern science and considerable research has been conducted into the nature of blackholes. Thus the reader can try to picture a hole in space which goes inwards, not along any of our three dimensions. This also applies to wormholes, and scientists speculate that these holes may link directly with other universe planes or curve back into our universe at some great linear 3D distance, but giving an almost instant connection through the inner-space pathways (wormholes).
Some physicists have speculated that our space is riddled with mini-blackholes (energy going inwards) and mini-whiteholes (energy coming out—such as the energy of a star but also the nucleus of an atom giving the positive charge). Thus we need at least an extra dimension of space to explain such phenomena.
We are showing that there is space which we can't perceive (with our limited frequency spectrum of consciousness). Also that there has been an inevitable degree of recognition of an inner space (blackholes) but where these ideas are seen as forming an underlying structure to external 3D space the acceptance ceases; closing the lid on 3D effects only, as being complete, even absolute rather than relative to its context (of 3D). Even the quantum reality of quantum physics is relegated to a fictional product of mathematics.
Let us take as an example of the type of subtle control that is occurring over knowledge. Maxwell's electromagnetic equations, the rockbed of electromagnetics, are taught in university physics and mathematics; one may wonder how many professors realise that these equations being taught are not the original ones of Maxwell. It is fairly well known, essentially outside academic circles, that physicists Gibbs and Heaviside removed from these equations the quaternions or scalar-wave terms—very much with the approval of Hertz.
The scalar terms have been refered to as expressing 5D etheric waves that are non-vector, and are oscillating electrostatic potential energy waves, which are longitudinal. The terms left untouched in the equations being taught today are the transverse Hertzian electromagnetic vector terms, very much detectable in our 3D space. Gibbs and Heaviside simply couldn't see the point of the additional scalar terms underlying the vector EM terms, since current physics formulations were supporting a 3D closed system and seemingly successsfully, and already precluded the possible role of these original terms since the existing premises of physics had no part for them; not recognising that they were supposed to elevate established scientific models to a higher order. At a deeper level, however, this does not imply it was entirely a mistake to remove the terms—meaning it is part of the ongoing suppression of inner-space reality.
Let us briefly digress to a contrasting example within religion, in particular, Christianity. The Bible reveals that Jesus used the word 'within' frequently, of which the proper meaning is not being taught to day; for example 'The Father within'. This concept of 'within' does not mean something intangible or lacking in existence, substance or dimension, or even a science. Ironically, however, it does mean atheists are correct; there is no (external) God. Thus again the role of inner space, which relates to inner consciousness, remains hidden.
Now going back to the scalar wave. It extends dimensionally beyond 3D, for example, it can wave in time, and affect 3D time. The frame of mind giving rise to the removal of the scalar terms from Maxwell's equations is of the same negative motivation which the great Nicola Tesla encountered early last century. Tesla, undoubtedly the father of electricity, whose name was removed from anything academically educational, discovered the real nature of radio transmission—not even taught today. At that time the German scientist Hertz was gaining recognition after his success in transmitting radio signals from one room to another. Tesla had realised that electromagnetic waves, which are transverse (sometimes referred to as Hertz waves today), attenuated too rapidly to transmit information over great distances. Tesla discovered that the longitudinal scalar wave was the underlying carrier wave for significant distances. Even though Hertz waves are detected around transmitters and receivers it was the scalar wave, propagating mainly through the ground and on the surface, and capable of pair coupling into EM Hertz waves, that was the dominant cause of radio transmission.
In fact in the early days of this research, Tesla in his enthusiasm for scientific truths took the long trip from the U.S. to Germany to meet Hertz. When returning, Tesla recounted on the train his immense regret of the visit. His enthusiasm had blinded him to the deflating effect his knowledge and convictions, regarding the role of scalar waves, would have on Hertz.
Nevertheless, as we know today, Tesla's theory was rejected by the obstinate and controlled academic community and Hertz received full accolade for his work to the degree that his name became the unit of cycles per second.
Science is cleverly rigged to ridicule any phenomena beyond the external-world or 3D spectrum. If we use the analogy given in previous articles of the dog chasing its own tail, the observer being the dog's head, observing its tail as apparently objective and separate from its head, in fact, part of the environment or universe, we can see that greater truth about the tail can be obtained via the 'subjective' inner-space connection of the dog's head, linked (physically) through the body to the tail. Similarly we observe the environment as objective and external to us, but in fact our consciousness is linked to the environment through inner space which is basically all mind anyway.
Science struggles to continue its denial of all such phenomena: ETs who exist and operate in these other spectrums of inner space; all spiritual phenomena; religion's evil spirits; the energies of the paranormal; ESP, etc. The human consciousness is a spectrum of frequencies, like a wave band, and functions in a similar manner to the antenna on the roof. When selecting a channel for the television, an adjustment is made to the tuning circuit and the antenna resonates with a particular wave band or spectrum of frequencies which now creates the television picture. Change the channel and the wave band selected by the antenna changes and we have a different picture. Similarly if we changed our consciousness frequencies we could tune into a different spectrum of inner space and perceive a different reality there.
This should be elementary physics or at least serious speculation based on existing verifiable knowledge. Why do we call it 'inner space' if it has its own objectivity? Our 3D as it exists today would be manifesting about the maximum objectivity if we were to measure the coefficient of objectivity (objectivity + subjectivity = 1; as objectivity decreases, subjectivity increases). The average person has no awareness of their inner roll in participating in their environmental existence.
Let us attempt to convey an understanding of this by using a simple analogy. Figure 1, in going from (a) to (d), shows increasing amounts of inner space, that is, increasing subjectivity and therefore decreasing objectivity. The figures are intended to follow up on the dog/tail analogy but with a little more clarity. Figure 1(a) depicts the 3D external-world observed phenomena, showing the simple surface, or linear connection between observer and object. Mainstream physics operates at this level. The observer can only know about the object by transfer of information across 3D space (the arrow between them).
Now Figure 1(b) includes a structural feature of consciousness, showing the inner-space condition. Figure 1(b) illustrates that a second order of information about the object, superimposed on the normal and aware linear transmission, is being expressed by the observer (the direction of the arrows might be considered both ways). This may occur via intuition.
Similarly Figure 1(c) and (d) show further higher orders of information representing greater development, awareness, or evolution of the observer. The increasing orders are increasing degrees of 'subjectivity' or mind linkage. This 'pyramid' of dots in Figure 1 should be imagined as infinitely dense and extended. The actual inner consciousness will extend through these fractal and collective levels, ultimately to their source.
It is interesting to note the way the macro-level of existence reflects the same physics principles as the micro-level and vice versa. The above configuration in Figure 1 is also the essence of how the learning pattern functions in skills (see articles on skills/physical mobility), in particular, in transducing 4D nonlinearity into linear 3D sequences.
If point A wasn't unconscious to the observer it would enable the observer to know completely the object below by means of A and lower orders of connecting information. We are not saying that humans could perceive these higher orders while in our 3D frequency spectrum (our world), though if they could they would already have left this quantitative dimension and 'ascended' to a higher realm—higher degree of the fractal matrix.
Figure 1(a) would give maximum objectivity (which in the limit is linearity) but (d) would give maximum subjectivity (nonlinearity in the limit). Between these two extremes is the gradient. But as the reader can see, the linearity is an illusion since the hierarchy behind it—Figures (b) to (d)—exists always but is unconscious, manifesting apparent objectivity. 'Objectivity' is synonymous here with 'unconscious' (the unconscious connection to the object). As one shifts from Figure 1(a) to (d), comprehension goes from external to within (inner space).
The introduction of inner space would of course require new physics premises. The basis of linear fractals would be recognised to be due to the nonlinear, internal, inner-space, fractal relationships, and would be understood much better. Furthermore, zero-point energy, the turbulent energetic state of vacuum, could be considered as beyond our immediate 3D, that is, its source would be. Thus again the acknowledgement of strata beyond our 3D 'surface', giving rise to so much energy, previously considered as zero, has been delayed, or more correctly belayed.
Another excellent scientific example of a source of energy not being identified is the laser. For simplicity consider ten rays of white light. They are not in coherence (in-phase frequencies). The total power or intensity is equal to about three rays added together. However, if we make the ten rays coherent—crescents and troughs of waves in step—the power increases. But it is much greater than the sum of each ray (10)—the current scientific explanation. It is apparently at least the square of ten, that is, a hundred times. The ten rays, now in resonance, quantum regenerate a higher fractal, that is, rekindle from the virtual state Fractal Matrix gradient a more powerful vortex, which is of higher frequency and not in the visible spectrum. The ten rays of light are now sub-harmonics of this higher-dimensional vortex, of which the latter manifests in the inner space.
Further examples range into 'genuine' errors in physics but again concealing the scalar wave. Let's charge a small sphere, say, positive (electrostatic charge) and bring up a point test charge, say, negative, to measure the field charge around the sphere. The point charge reacts with a vector force towards the sphere and we say there is an electric force there. Move the test charge around the space and we identify a complete electric field E around the sphere. But do we? This is current physics. Can we assume the electric field was there before we put in the test charge. No. Science will find that the prior field is an electrostatic scalar-wave potential. Similarly for the gravitational field. Place an object in the gravitational field, but hold it there, or let it rest on the surface of the Earth, and we measure a gravitational force. But gravity is not a gravitational force unless it is acting on an object. It is a scalar field—a property of 4D and inner space.
We might add to the list that animal abilities are not placed in the category of the paranormal. (Note that appropriately mind energies are scalar.) Only methods are researched and explanations given which incorporate existing, extremely limiting materialistic 3D linear physics principles: simple magnetic-field systems around pigeons to explain their homing abilities, chemical senses to explain olfactory detection by insects over relatively considerable distances, etc.
Let us not forget the experience of improbable 'meaningful coincidences', which are relegated to random coincidences, rather than investigating theories of synchronicity (meaning something has synchronised them). There is also the discrediting scientific views on life after death, and as we have indicated, the nature of God. These are all desperate attempts to avoid inner space, extended dimensions and frequencies outside our immediately detectable spectrum.
Is there any concrete data from empirical observations that justifies the materialistic viewpoint of the academic scientist? Why is there so much emphasis on the matter or particle aspect of nature? Quite apart from the control over knowledge which is blatant on this planet, there is the genuine observation and conclusion that when the specific scientific observation is made, the particle level is revealed.
It is well known in quantum physics that the process of detection results in the particle observation, even if waves are being viewed. This comes under the wave/particle duality. Our detection of the so-called quantum reality, of phase-correlation (holistic) causes a quantum reduction from this phase-correlation to our material reality of phase-randomisation. The unity aspects are converted to the quantitative particle view, and thus science erroneously establishes that the universe is comprised of particles stuck together by forces.
There is a genuine tendency therefore to believe there is only the material particle world—even the quantum reality is considered as a product of mathematical fiction by the scientists. The structure of our immediate perception and scientific instruments are such that the world of materiality appears to be the only one. It might be realised now why scientific methodology is not compatible with the nature of paranormal, phenomena, ESP, etc. It is self-defeating. The mental and physical framework of the established experimental method will 'quantum reduce' the paranormal energies to the world of particles apparently stuck together by forces, that is, with subsequent failure of the necessary integrations and resonance for the subtle energies (of inner space) to function. This is a great irony; stupidity and the cunning deception of science's role in evaluating the paranormal.
To eliminate the infinite potential of inner space from the existence of a civilisation is like severing a twig from its higher fractals of incrementing branches going back (analogy: inner space) to their source, the tree trunk.
THE PRINCIPLE OF QUANTUM REGENERATION: A MAJOR SCIENTIFIC OMISSION, Noel Huntley, Ph.D.
We have referenced this principle in other articles but here we shall give it special attention. The opposite of quantum regeneration is quantum reduction, which in simple terms is the division or fragmentation of wholes into parts, whereas quantum regeneration is combining parts back into wholes. We may see that this requires a minimum of three components---for a more general description see article The Triad Principle of Creation.
Note that the term 'quantum reduction' is used in quantum physics, and although we may recognise this as a real and more general process of nature it is unfortunately only used essentially as a theoretical fix to explain how the quantum reality reduces its many-probabilities to a single one in material reality, referred to as being quantum reduced from phase-correlation (the quantum reality) to phase-randomisation (the material reality).
To illustrate quantum regeneration (and, where necessary, quantum reduction) we shall present a wide variety of examples ranging from the laser, to two people communicating, to the development of learning patterns; also we find this leads us into an explanation of antimatter and dark matter of the universe. The quantum regeneration principle is that if two or more elements (energies, particles, etc.) are in resonance, that is, the frequencies are identical and in phase, a single energy/frequency state is quantum regenerated which links the separate elements together---a kind of collective of the separate elements. (Clearly we are not referring to widely separated electromagnetic waves which happen to be in step, that is, coherent.)
Some of our examples have been discussed previously, in particular, the laser has been referenced numerous times. However, it is an excellent and basic physics example and will be described again here. Note that this explanation has not yet been recognised in orthodox science since it would be impossible to prove with current scientific methodology.
The rays of white light are random and their waves are out of phase---they are not coherent. If we consider a mere group of ten rays for illustration purposes, then the total power of this group is about three times the power of one ray. Now in the laser, the light waves are coherent, in harmony. Current science will probably tell you the total power of this group of ten is now ten times one ray. But this is nowhere near enough to explain the enormous energy of the laser. The energy will be found to be something like the square of ten (10 x 10) plus another increasing factor since the energy relationships will be found to be holographic (true unity will be found to be infinitely holographic---see article on unity in the new education section, and the article on the holographic universe). The reason is that by putting the rays into phase, a single higher-frequency oscillating vortex of energy has been quantum regenerated from the virtual state. The visible rays in the beam of the laser are now subharmonics of this more powerful collective frequency within inner space, which holds them in unison.
Let us now move to a completely different example: a feature of learning. We shall focus on physical learning, that is, skills---the subject of coordination and reflex ability in physical movements.
Firstly, recognise that every fraction of a single movement is coordinated or linked to every other fraction of that movement in a learned sequence, giving rise to ease in controlling that simple movement. (A learning pattern is a 4D holographic template which houses programmes---see learning pattern article and others on skill.) We generally consider coordination of separate whole movements, for example, coordinating the left arm with the right in, say, keyboard technique. Let us thus take as an example the process involved in coordinating the left and right arms.
As we practise, the attention must be controlled from one arm to the other---this we experience as mental effort. But the attention is a manifestation of consciousness, and contrary to science it is not an 'illusion' but a real energy in itself. It has a spectrum of frequencies too high for scientific instruments to detect. This consciousness energy is also the input to the mind mechanisms, learning patterns, etc.
What will be occurring when we link up the two arms is that this input consciousness entrains some of its frequencies with the learning-pattern frequencies of one arm, and then the other arm, bringing them in turn into coherence. This is like considering each arm has a computer (the learning patterns) and we are linking together the bits (storage units) of one arm with the other by means of this resonance (coherence, entrainment, phase-entanglement) between the 'bits.' This is as 'mechanical' as the robot arms in a motor vehicle factory.
Now as more and more bits are oscillating in coherence from one arm to the other, a quantum regeneration takes place in which further units develop 'between' the two arms (in the mind)---this is the 'triad' effect. Now we only have to activate this single piece of information to coordinate both arms simultaneously. Thus we might say that learning is resonance---meaning that the connections/associations for learning are formed by resonance. Note that in genetics, molecules are diagrammed as though the geometric shape fits and hooks them together. This locking would be achieved by resonance (frequency affiliation).
A very different example would be two people communicating and being 'on the same wavelength.' This is literal. Certain frequencies associated with the subject material of their conversation become entrained, that is, are the same and are in step. This quantum-regenerates a single, even if intermittent, collective state, which is a frequency higher and more energetic than the individual ones of each person, and greater than the sum of them. Two such people or a group working together in harmony ('on the same wavelength') can generate more power to be effective, than the sum of the individuals. This will be more than the square of the sum, as mentioned.
Is there a parallel in art? Let's consider a work of art, say, a painting of high merit (aesthetic art, not other forms of communication, utilising art---see articles on understanding art).
Now the bits of paint on the canvass are quantitative physically in that they are fragments stuck together by forces. However, the artist has placed the brush marks in a special order. Thus the artist has created a qualitative effect from a quantitative state or medium. The appreciative viewer now looks at the physical surface of the painting; eyes may go slightly out of focus, the intellectual and conscious mind step aside and the 'unconscious' now correlates all the bits to quantum regenerate one whole state. Because the bits of paint (the 'quantitative') have been subtly ordered to be correlatable, then resonance can be achieved, resulting in a single whole energy that has (hopefully) complete unity and is a quantum state.
This condition is of course in the mind. Thus a qualitative state in the mind of the observer is now superimposed on the quantitative state of the paint on the canvass---and appreciation has occurred. Of course we can't say much about the experiential aspects of this, except that it will be at least pleasing, will have a sense of unity, harmony and completion---nothing need be added or taken away.
Let us continue with further examples of quantum regeneration. A very good one is advanced spacecraft propulsion, which we have covered in previous articles. The craft's generator, which could be a scalar-field system, entrains all the atomic oscillations of the body of the ship. That is, the frequencies are put in phase and made coherent (as with the laser, etc.). This instantly quantum regenerates a whole (collective) vortex oscillation in higher space (meaning of higher frequency outside the 3D range). (Note that a still more advanced civilisation would achieve this without a generator by using their minds.)
The atomic frequencies are now subharmonics of the single, higher and more powerful frequency. This powerful energy oscillation envelops the craft, and it is of the same physics as cosmic oscillations of natural bodies, such as a planet, star or galaxy, etc. Thus the craft can adjust and align its frequencies with those of cosmic bodies, such as planets, stars, star systems, the galaxy, etc. Depending on the phase relationship it will be pulled towards or away from the cosmic body at very high velocity. In general, an out of phase relation would be maintained for intermediate speed control.
Collective effects of consciousness or species, and thought forms would come into this quantum regeneration category. The individuals generating the same frequency patterns, whether positive or negative, will quantum regenerate a powerful effect at the collective level, or even create the collective where this is weak and fragmented. This is the emergent software effect referred to in science. Science doesn't recognise, however, that there is a real quantum state of collective energy rekindled out of the virtual-state hierarchy---not some abstract, nonphysical, insubstantial software programme. The organism 'dictyostelium' is a good living example. They periodically send out signals that bring together about 100,000 or so such organisms, which merge, forming a single organism, just visible. A new programme is elicited and this entity then finds a suitable plant to climb where it extends itself, like a mushroom shape with most of its mass at the top, and waits for a gust of wind to scatter the 'spores' into new foraging grounds. Note that the organism would already have an inherent collective, but so do humans. Also the connectivity, if over considerable distances, would have to be achieved by scalar (mind) waves rather than EM waves.
We may find that all learning involves resonance: the integration of parts to form a single whole or quantum state of data. Academically we merely think of two items as associated, that is, stored side by side and connected in some way. This would be the case at the 3D level but underlying this within an inner-space layer there will probably always be a single state, representing the whole of these two parts. It is interesting that quantum physics has long since applied this principle but it is only considered to be a mathematical convenience or fiction.
Thus when parts come together in unity through resonance, such as even particles and antiparticles, a single entity of greater unity is formed (not recognised), which now resonates and occupies the next spectrum of frequencies. We shall say more on this shortly.
Now, naturally occurring entities already have the higher aspects present. Taking this into account, we can identify three features of quantum regeneration: 1) previously separate parts (any number) resonating to create (quantum-regenerate) a collective state that all the parts can now access instantly (Figure 1(a)); 2) to connect up to and resonate with an already existing single quantum state or unity (the fractal is manifest), such as all natural entities, cells, planets, star systems, galaxies (Figure 1(b)); and 3) two opposites, such as particle and antiparticle, apparently disappearing in a burst of energy, but in fact (and not recognised) quantum regenerating back to the state of unity in the next fractal spectrum (Figure 1(c)).
For quantum reduction we can identify two processes: 1) reducing a whole state into any number of parts (Figure 2(a)); 2) reduction into only two states but which are opposite poles (Figure 2(b)).
Number 1, Figure 2(a), of quantum reduction is probably the most common, along with its companion no.1, Figure 1(a), quantum regeneration. The mind is continually reducing higher states, whole ideas, etc. into parts. Two people communicating are reducing ideas into word sequences then transmitting them. The recipient reverses the process, that is, quantum regenerates the words back into the idea. Furthermore, higher aspects of consciousness, that is, higher fractal levels, are continually downloading information to the subconscious and 3D consciousness, quantum reducing energy in a higher-order format. This is the direction of the energy of continuous creation.
Quantum physics, theoretically and experimentally, supports the polarity type features (Figure 1(c) and Figure 2(b)), with the phenomenon known as 'phase-entanglement'. If two particles, say, electrons are created together, their spins will be opposite but the particles remain interconnected, no matter what their degree of separation is. Both spins, clockwise and anticlockwise are considered to exist simultaneously for each particle in the quantum reality before observation. However, the observation quantum-reduces the particle to either one spin or the other, but simultaneously the other particle manifests the opposite spin. The total spin of both particles must be zero. Further, physics recognises that all particles have antiparticles which must be created simultaneously. It is also observed that when particles and antiparticles come together they annihilate one another in a burst of energy. The particle/antiparticle must surely form a fundamental polarity for the structuring of the universe. However, why aren't positive and negative charges, etc., such as those of protons and electrons, etc., sufficient to structure the universe? Why antiparticles?
There aren't even enough antiparticles (detectable) or antimatter in the observable universe to balance or cancel out the observable mass of our universe, whereas we have the evidence that positive and negative charge would cancel, ensuring the disappearance of all matter (in 3D) and restoring zero. (Note: antimatter is made up of antiparticles.) This is where dark matter enters into the mystery. Recognised inadequacies in existing theories requires that our galaxy needs much more matter to hold things together.
Let us approach the problem this way. Why do particles have antiparticles? Why do positive charges have a balance with negative charges? In both cases the fact that they cancel out in a disappearing act tells us that they were created by division of energy which was the unity of the opposite charges. Thus the positive and negative charges, kept separate, manifest the existence of the universe as we know it, but also particles and antiparticles play a role---but what role? Take a look at Figure 3.
Note that when we add up all the matter and antimatter, it all cancels, as it should. Thus just as particles have antiparticles, so do universes have anti-universes but also other fractal levels. If for every particle there is an antiparticle then there must be anti-planets, anti-stars, anti-galaxies, etc. These are fractal levels and thus fractals have anti-fractals (for further confirmation see cosmic map article, also article on source of fractals). This is a huge 'shock' to science but current science is in its infancy. Unfortunately science hasn't even recognised that the vortex oscillation in Figure 3(b) is fundamental to all creation, whether in the small, such as particles or atoms, or in the large, such as galaxies or universes. (See article The Basic Energy Unit: The Vortex.)
In Figure 3 we see that the matter and antimatter balance but scientists require that dark matter must be about 10 times that of all our own stars, etc. If this requirement is valid there is no problem 'finding' at least that amount if we continue to move up the hierarchy of fractal universe/anti-universe pairs (use the see-saw analogy at the end of this article).*
The fact that quantum physics experimentally has shown that the particle's spin is such that it always cancels out the other antiparticle's spin in total, tells us that both such particles came from a particle which is the unity of the two. As we have stated in other articles this particle of greater unity will have a higher frequency outside the 3D spectrum but will form another polarity and is part of the next fractal level.
This is a fundamental feature of evolution and ascension. It is a universal process that particles come together, forming greater unity in the next universe layer, fractal level or dimension and then again form yet a further unity into the next fractal level towards complete unity (no polarity) and the final absolute point of stillness at the Source of all fractals and creation. This same process occurs for all forms of consciousness: people, planets, etc, also the DNA, but this is way beyond current scientific thinking which would regard this as outrageous theory. It is very complex and is the subject touched on in previous articles, of polarities within polarities, extending all the way back to the absolute source of unity.
The main point relevant to this article is that ascension is a form of quantum regeneration in which parts (polarities in this case) come together to 'ascend' to greater degrees of unity (see cosmic map article). This is because a lower level of frequencies has activated a higher level and connected up to it. This is also a case of when the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
*If it is of any help we can describe the see-saw analogy. Imagine a small see-saw; the rocking represents the oscillations of particles---one side is positive and the other negative. We consider now that our existence encompasses both sides of the see-saw, such as being aware of electrons (negative) and protons (positive) and that all the positive and negative particles would cancel to zero---as does the two sides of the see-saw within their fulcrum (still point in centre). Now in this existence we are aware that particles have antiparticles. In this analogy it means the little see-saw (no.1) is on the end of a larger see-saw (no.2) at right angles---a polarity within a polarity (also another small see-saw on the other end of no.2). But we are on the particle side of see-saw no.2 and only vaguely aware of the other antiparticle side of the see-saw (containing invisible 'dark' matter).
Note that the term 'quantum reduction' is used in quantum physics, and although we may recognise this as a real and more general process of nature it is unfortunately only used essentially as a theoretical fix to explain how the quantum reality reduces its many-probabilities to a single one in material reality, referred to as being quantum reduced from phase-correlation (the quantum reality) to phase-randomisation (the material reality).
To illustrate quantum regeneration (and, where necessary, quantum reduction) we shall present a wide variety of examples ranging from the laser, to two people communicating, to the development of learning patterns; also we find this leads us into an explanation of antimatter and dark matter of the universe. The quantum regeneration principle is that if two or more elements (energies, particles, etc.) are in resonance, that is, the frequencies are identical and in phase, a single energy/frequency state is quantum regenerated which links the separate elements together---a kind of collective of the separate elements. (Clearly we are not referring to widely separated electromagnetic waves which happen to be in step, that is, coherent.)
Some of our examples have been discussed previously, in particular, the laser has been referenced numerous times. However, it is an excellent and basic physics example and will be described again here. Note that this explanation has not yet been recognised in orthodox science since it would be impossible to prove with current scientific methodology.
The rays of white light are random and their waves are out of phase---they are not coherent. If we consider a mere group of ten rays for illustration purposes, then the total power of this group is about three times the power of one ray. Now in the laser, the light waves are coherent, in harmony. Current science will probably tell you the total power of this group of ten is now ten times one ray. But this is nowhere near enough to explain the enormous energy of the laser. The energy will be found to be something like the square of ten (10 x 10) plus another increasing factor since the energy relationships will be found to be holographic (true unity will be found to be infinitely holographic---see article on unity in the new education section, and the article on the holographic universe). The reason is that by putting the rays into phase, a single higher-frequency oscillating vortex of energy has been quantum regenerated from the virtual state. The visible rays in the beam of the laser are now subharmonics of this more powerful collective frequency within inner space, which holds them in unison.
Let us now move to a completely different example: a feature of learning. We shall focus on physical learning, that is, skills---the subject of coordination and reflex ability in physical movements.
Firstly, recognise that every fraction of a single movement is coordinated or linked to every other fraction of that movement in a learned sequence, giving rise to ease in controlling that simple movement. (A learning pattern is a 4D holographic template which houses programmes---see learning pattern article and others on skill.) We generally consider coordination of separate whole movements, for example, coordinating the left arm with the right in, say, keyboard technique. Let us thus take as an example the process involved in coordinating the left and right arms.
As we practise, the attention must be controlled from one arm to the other---this we experience as mental effort. But the attention is a manifestation of consciousness, and contrary to science it is not an 'illusion' but a real energy in itself. It has a spectrum of frequencies too high for scientific instruments to detect. This consciousness energy is also the input to the mind mechanisms, learning patterns, etc.
What will be occurring when we link up the two arms is that this input consciousness entrains some of its frequencies with the learning-pattern frequencies of one arm, and then the other arm, bringing them in turn into coherence. This is like considering each arm has a computer (the learning patterns) and we are linking together the bits (storage units) of one arm with the other by means of this resonance (coherence, entrainment, phase-entanglement) between the 'bits.' This is as 'mechanical' as the robot arms in a motor vehicle factory.
Now as more and more bits are oscillating in coherence from one arm to the other, a quantum regeneration takes place in which further units develop 'between' the two arms (in the mind)---this is the 'triad' effect. Now we only have to activate this single piece of information to coordinate both arms simultaneously. Thus we might say that learning is resonance---meaning that the connections/associations for learning are formed by resonance. Note that in genetics, molecules are diagrammed as though the geometric shape fits and hooks them together. This locking would be achieved by resonance (frequency affiliation).
A very different example would be two people communicating and being 'on the same wavelength.' This is literal. Certain frequencies associated with the subject material of their conversation become entrained, that is, are the same and are in step. This quantum-regenerates a single, even if intermittent, collective state, which is a frequency higher and more energetic than the individual ones of each person, and greater than the sum of them. Two such people or a group working together in harmony ('on the same wavelength') can generate more power to be effective, than the sum of the individuals. This will be more than the square of the sum, as mentioned.
Is there a parallel in art? Let's consider a work of art, say, a painting of high merit (aesthetic art, not other forms of communication, utilising art---see articles on understanding art).
Now the bits of paint on the canvass are quantitative physically in that they are fragments stuck together by forces. However, the artist has placed the brush marks in a special order. Thus the artist has created a qualitative effect from a quantitative state or medium. The appreciative viewer now looks at the physical surface of the painting; eyes may go slightly out of focus, the intellectual and conscious mind step aside and the 'unconscious' now correlates all the bits to quantum regenerate one whole state. Because the bits of paint (the 'quantitative') have been subtly ordered to be correlatable, then resonance can be achieved, resulting in a single whole energy that has (hopefully) complete unity and is a quantum state.
This condition is of course in the mind. Thus a qualitative state in the mind of the observer is now superimposed on the quantitative state of the paint on the canvass---and appreciation has occurred. Of course we can't say much about the experiential aspects of this, except that it will be at least pleasing, will have a sense of unity, harmony and completion---nothing need be added or taken away.
Let us continue with further examples of quantum regeneration. A very good one is advanced spacecraft propulsion, which we have covered in previous articles. The craft's generator, which could be a scalar-field system, entrains all the atomic oscillations of the body of the ship. That is, the frequencies are put in phase and made coherent (as with the laser, etc.). This instantly quantum regenerates a whole (collective) vortex oscillation in higher space (meaning of higher frequency outside the 3D range). (Note that a still more advanced civilisation would achieve this without a generator by using their minds.)
The atomic frequencies are now subharmonics of the single, higher and more powerful frequency. This powerful energy oscillation envelops the craft, and it is of the same physics as cosmic oscillations of natural bodies, such as a planet, star or galaxy, etc. Thus the craft can adjust and align its frequencies with those of cosmic bodies, such as planets, stars, star systems, the galaxy, etc. Depending on the phase relationship it will be pulled towards or away from the cosmic body at very high velocity. In general, an out of phase relation would be maintained for intermediate speed control.
Collective effects of consciousness or species, and thought forms would come into this quantum regeneration category. The individuals generating the same frequency patterns, whether positive or negative, will quantum regenerate a powerful effect at the collective level, or even create the collective where this is weak and fragmented. This is the emergent software effect referred to in science. Science doesn't recognise, however, that there is a real quantum state of collective energy rekindled out of the virtual-state hierarchy---not some abstract, nonphysical, insubstantial software programme. The organism 'dictyostelium' is a good living example. They periodically send out signals that bring together about 100,000 or so such organisms, which merge, forming a single organism, just visible. A new programme is elicited and this entity then finds a suitable plant to climb where it extends itself, like a mushroom shape with most of its mass at the top, and waits for a gust of wind to scatter the 'spores' into new foraging grounds. Note that the organism would already have an inherent collective, but so do humans. Also the connectivity, if over considerable distances, would have to be achieved by scalar (mind) waves rather than EM waves.
We may find that all learning involves resonance: the integration of parts to form a single whole or quantum state of data. Academically we merely think of two items as associated, that is, stored side by side and connected in some way. This would be the case at the 3D level but underlying this within an inner-space layer there will probably always be a single state, representing the whole of these two parts. It is interesting that quantum physics has long since applied this principle but it is only considered to be a mathematical convenience or fiction.
Thus when parts come together in unity through resonance, such as even particles and antiparticles, a single entity of greater unity is formed (not recognised), which now resonates and occupies the next spectrum of frequencies. We shall say more on this shortly.
Now, naturally occurring entities already have the higher aspects present. Taking this into account, we can identify three features of quantum regeneration: 1) previously separate parts (any number) resonating to create (quantum-regenerate) a collective state that all the parts can now access instantly (Figure 1(a)); 2) to connect up to and resonate with an already existing single quantum state or unity (the fractal is manifest), such as all natural entities, cells, planets, star systems, galaxies (Figure 1(b)); and 3) two opposites, such as particle and antiparticle, apparently disappearing in a burst of energy, but in fact (and not recognised) quantum regenerating back to the state of unity in the next fractal spectrum (Figure 1(c)).
For quantum reduction we can identify two processes: 1) reducing a whole state into any number of parts (Figure 2(a)); 2) reduction into only two states but which are opposite poles (Figure 2(b)).
Number 1, Figure 2(a), of quantum reduction is probably the most common, along with its companion no.1, Figure 1(a), quantum regeneration. The mind is continually reducing higher states, whole ideas, etc. into parts. Two people communicating are reducing ideas into word sequences then transmitting them. The recipient reverses the process, that is, quantum regenerates the words back into the idea. Furthermore, higher aspects of consciousness, that is, higher fractal levels, are continually downloading information to the subconscious and 3D consciousness, quantum reducing energy in a higher-order format. This is the direction of the energy of continuous creation.
Quantum physics, theoretically and experimentally, supports the polarity type features (Figure 1(c) and Figure 2(b)), with the phenomenon known as 'phase-entanglement'. If two particles, say, electrons are created together, their spins will be opposite but the particles remain interconnected, no matter what their degree of separation is. Both spins, clockwise and anticlockwise are considered to exist simultaneously for each particle in the quantum reality before observation. However, the observation quantum-reduces the particle to either one spin or the other, but simultaneously the other particle manifests the opposite spin. The total spin of both particles must be zero. Further, physics recognises that all particles have antiparticles which must be created simultaneously. It is also observed that when particles and antiparticles come together they annihilate one another in a burst of energy. The particle/antiparticle must surely form a fundamental polarity for the structuring of the universe. However, why aren't positive and negative charges, etc., such as those of protons and electrons, etc., sufficient to structure the universe? Why antiparticles?
There aren't even enough antiparticles (detectable) or antimatter in the observable universe to balance or cancel out the observable mass of our universe, whereas we have the evidence that positive and negative charge would cancel, ensuring the disappearance of all matter (in 3D) and restoring zero. (Note: antimatter is made up of antiparticles.) This is where dark matter enters into the mystery. Recognised inadequacies in existing theories requires that our galaxy needs much more matter to hold things together.
Let us approach the problem this way. Why do particles have antiparticles? Why do positive charges have a balance with negative charges? In both cases the fact that they cancel out in a disappearing act tells us that they were created by division of energy which was the unity of the opposite charges. Thus the positive and negative charges, kept separate, manifest the existence of the universe as we know it, but also particles and antiparticles play a role---but what role? Take a look at Figure 3.
Note that when we add up all the matter and antimatter, it all cancels, as it should. Thus just as particles have antiparticles, so do universes have anti-universes but also other fractal levels. If for every particle there is an antiparticle then there must be anti-planets, anti-stars, anti-galaxies, etc. These are fractal levels and thus fractals have anti-fractals (for further confirmation see cosmic map article, also article on source of fractals). This is a huge 'shock' to science but current science is in its infancy. Unfortunately science hasn't even recognised that the vortex oscillation in Figure 3(b) is fundamental to all creation, whether in the small, such as particles or atoms, or in the large, such as galaxies or universes. (See article The Basic Energy Unit: The Vortex.)
In Figure 3 we see that the matter and antimatter balance but scientists require that dark matter must be about 10 times that of all our own stars, etc. If this requirement is valid there is no problem 'finding' at least that amount if we continue to move up the hierarchy of fractal universe/anti-universe pairs (use the see-saw analogy at the end of this article).*
The fact that quantum physics experimentally has shown that the particle's spin is such that it always cancels out the other antiparticle's spin in total, tells us that both such particles came from a particle which is the unity of the two. As we have stated in other articles this particle of greater unity will have a higher frequency outside the 3D spectrum but will form another polarity and is part of the next fractal level.
This is a fundamental feature of evolution and ascension. It is a universal process that particles come together, forming greater unity in the next universe layer, fractal level or dimension and then again form yet a further unity into the next fractal level towards complete unity (no polarity) and the final absolute point of stillness at the Source of all fractals and creation. This same process occurs for all forms of consciousness: people, planets, etc, also the DNA, but this is way beyond current scientific thinking which would regard this as outrageous theory. It is very complex and is the subject touched on in previous articles, of polarities within polarities, extending all the way back to the absolute source of unity.
The main point relevant to this article is that ascension is a form of quantum regeneration in which parts (polarities in this case) come together to 'ascend' to greater degrees of unity (see cosmic map article). This is because a lower level of frequencies has activated a higher level and connected up to it. This is also a case of when the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
*If it is of any help we can describe the see-saw analogy. Imagine a small see-saw; the rocking represents the oscillations of particles---one side is positive and the other negative. We consider now that our existence encompasses both sides of the see-saw, such as being aware of electrons (negative) and protons (positive) and that all the positive and negative particles would cancel to zero---as does the two sides of the see-saw within their fulcrum (still point in centre). Now in this existence we are aware that particles have antiparticles. In this analogy it means the little see-saw (no.1) is on the end of a larger see-saw (no.2) at right angles---a polarity within a polarity (also another small see-saw on the other end of no.2). But we are on the particle side of see-saw no.2 and only vaguely aware of the other antiparticle side of the see-saw (containing invisible 'dark' matter).
The amount of antimatter observed and present within our side that is entering from the other side on see-saw no.2 is not enough to balance the matter on our side. As the species evolves fully onto the next fractal level (see-saw no.2), both sides of see-saw no.2 are recognised and are part of the new frequency spectrum. But by this time there is a vague awareness of 'antiparticles' (of a higher order than the previous ones). This is a larger see-saw, no.3, which has no.2 on one end (at right angles). Can the reader see that the fulcrum still-point was only a relative zero?---our universe is carried or biassed by a string of 'relative zeros.' The opposite side of see-saw no.3 now also appears as missing matter or dark matter. And so on in the same way the fractal twig of a tree is connected up to a branch, the next fractal level, all the way back to the source, the tree trunk (but not having the same number of fractals).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)